From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:11:53 +0300 Message-ID: <47333549.90505@suse.de> References: <1193652664.22149.4.camel@localhost> <200711050118.34610.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071108155344.GA12231@cataract> <200711081717.00421.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from charybdis-ext.suse.de ([195.135.221.2]:60212 "EHLO emea5-mh.id5.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759587AbXKHQMB (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200711081717.00421.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Johannes Weiner , "Michael (rabenkind) Brandstetter" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call >> acpi_battery_update() at all? > > Alex? If someone wants to read stale values, he could comment out acpi_battery_update. Regards, Alex.