From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
lenb@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI:remove panic in case hardware has changed after S4
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 17:35:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4740878.DpcUBhhgIN@linux-5eaq.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130715150611.GC1074@khazad-dum.debian.net>
On Monday 15 July 2013 12:06:11 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > I would not make it too complicated.
> > Sticking to the latest Windows version should be enough for this one.
> > What bad should happen if we still try to resume and fail...
>
> Hmm, why was that check added in the first place?
Safety.
> If it is useless,
> removing it for good is fine. If it is _not_ useless, we should still do
> the checking when not operating in windows-8 firmware mode.
Firmware will only be tested against Windows 8 pretty soon.
We'd end up with a gigantic list of exceptions.
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-15 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 11:43 [PATCH] ACPI:remove panic in case hardware has changed after S4 oliver
2013-07-15 11:55 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-07-15 12:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-15 12:31 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-07-15 12:44 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-07-15 15:06 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-07-15 15:35 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2013-07-15 16:34 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-07-15 23:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-16 7:30 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-07-17 14:58 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-07-17 22:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-31 23:52 ` joeyli
2013-07-16 7:32 ` joeyli
2013-07-16 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-10 9:51 oliver
2014-01-11 1:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-11 12:14 oliver
2013-07-11 20:50 ` joeyli
2013-07-12 7:31 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-07-12 7:37 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-07-12 8:45 ` joeyli
2013-07-15 11:29 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-07-15 11:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-15 11:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-07-15 13:59 ` joeyli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4740878.DpcUBhhgIN@linux-5eaq.site \
--to=oneukum@suse.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).