From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: ACPI and PM material for v3.15-rc1 (current queue) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:40:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4752174.DIeOl6EhdE@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <2611540.GrpzWjVQ7v@vostro.rjw.lan> <532B8A4B.9000808@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <532B8A4B.9000808@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hanjun Guo Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PCI , Bjorn Helgaas List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Friday, March 21, 2014 08:39:39 AM Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Rafael, Hi, > On 2014=E5=B9=B403=E6=9C=8821=E6=97=A5 08:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote= : > > Hi All, > > > > My queue for the first pull request during the upcoming 3.15 merge = window > > contains the material below. Following the rule that everything I = send > > pull requests for should spend at least one day in linux-next, I'm = not > > going to add any more new commits to it at this point. > > > > Most likely, there will be more ACPI+PM pull request during the 3.1= 5 cycle, > > so if I missed something, it still may be possible to get that into= that > > kernel, but there has to be a good reason for it. > > > > Kind regards, > > Rafael > > > > > > --------------- > > > > Hanjun Guo (2): > > ACPI / tables: Replace printk with pr_* > > ACPI: Remove duplicate definitions of PREFIX >=20 > It seems that you missed some of my patches: > ACPI: Move BAD_MADT_ENTRY() to linux/acpi.h > ACPI / idle: Make idle_boot_override depend on x86 and ia64 > ACPI / trivial: Fix the return value type of acpi_processor_eval_pdc(= ) > ACPI / processor: Replace hard-coded "ACPI0007" with=20 > ACPI_PROCESSOR_DEVICE_HID >=20 > I think those 4 patches can be merged in 3.15 and you already accepte= d them. Yes, I did not include the acpi-processor branch, sorry about that and = thanks for spotting it! That branch was in linux-next before, though, so I'll push it for 3.15-= rc1. > and this patch still need more acks and then you will accept it: > ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more=20 > arch-independent >=20 > and this patch was reverted from your tree suggested by Catalin and S= udeep, > ACPI / processor: Introduce map_gic_id() to get apic id from MADT or=20 > _MAT method >=20 > Sorry for the confusion if I missed something. I don't think you missed anything, thanks! --=20 I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.