No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

[Jan Willies]

Hello,

Since the 2.6.24-rcs my ACPI doesn't work correctly anymore. For instance, battery level is not reported and wakeup from S3 (s2ram) doesn't work anymore. My laptop is a Medion MD 96400 (MSI S270 equivalent).

My menuconfig looks like this:

[ ]   Deprecated /proc/acpi files
[ ]   Deprecated power /proc/acpi folders
[ ]   Deprecated /proc/acpi/event support
<M>   AC Adapter
<M>   Battery

--- Power supply class support
[ ]   Power supply debug
< >   Generic PDA/phone power driver
< >   DS2760 battery driver (HP iPAQ & others)

dmesg output:

 BIOS-e820: 0000000037f40000 - 0000000037f50000 (ACPI data)
 BIOS-e820: 0000000037f50000 - 0000000038000000 (ACPI NVS)
ACPI: RSDP 000F8360, 0014 (r0 MSI   )
ACPI: RSDT 37F40000, 003C (r1 MSI    1013      9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: FACP 37F40200, 0081 (r2 MSI    1013      9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: DSDT 37F403F0, 31EC (r1    MSI     1013  9262005 INTL  2002026)
ACPI: FACS 37F50000, 0040
ACPI: APIC 37F40300, 0054 (r1 MSI    OEMAPIC   9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: WDRT 37F40360, 0047 (r1 MSI    MSI_OEM   9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: MCFG 37F403B0, 003C (r1 MSI    OEMMCFG   9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: SSDT 37F435E0, 002B (r1 OEM_ID OEMTBLID        1 INTL  2002026)
ACPI: OEMB 37F50040, 0049 (r1 MSI    MSI_OEM   9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x4008
ACPI: Core revision 20070126
ACPI: Table DSDT replaced by host OS
ACPI: DSDT 00000000, 2D03 (r1    MSI     1013  9262005 INTL 20061109)
ACPI: DSDT override uses original SSDTs unless "acpi_no_auto_ssdt"ACPI: setting ELCR to 0200 (from 0ce0)
ACPI: bus type pci registered
ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S5)
ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
ACPI: EC: GPE = 0x6, I/O: command/status = 0x66, data = 0x62
ACPI: EC: driver started in poll mode
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P1._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.POP2._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled.
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 5 6 7 *10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs *5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 5 *6 7 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 5 6 *7 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs *5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled.
pnp: PnP ACPI init
ACPI: bus type pnp registered
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode
pnp: PnP ACPI: found 9 devices
ACPI: ACPI bus type pnp unregistered
PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
ACPI: RTC can wake from S4
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] enabled at IRQ 11
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:04.0[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] enabled at IRQ 6
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:04.1[B] -> Link [LNKE] -> GSI 6 (level, low) -> IRQ 6
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] enabled at IRQ 10
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:14.6[B] -> Link [LNKB] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:00:14.6 disabled
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] enabled at IRQ 11
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:14.1[A] -> Link [LNKA] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] enabled at IRQ 5
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:03.0[A] -> Link [LNKC] -> GSI 5 (level, low) -> IRQ 5
ACPI: duty_cycle spans bit 4
ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3])
Time: acpi_pm clocksource has been installed.
ACPI: AC Adapter [ADP1] (off-line)
ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present)
ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF]
ACPI: Lid Switch [LID0]
ACPI: Sleep Button (CM) [SLPB]
ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB]
ACPI: Thermal Zone [THRM] (62 C)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:13.0[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:13.1[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:13.2[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:14.5[B] -> Link [LNKB] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] enabled at IRQ 5
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:09.0[A] -> Link [LNKG] -> GSI 5 (level, low) -> IRQ 5
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:01:05.0[A] -> Link [LNKB] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -78349667 ns)
spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7.

root@jan ~ # find /sys/ -name \*acpi\*
/sys/bus/acpi
/sys/firmware/acpi
/sys/module/pci_hotplug/parameters/debug_acpi
/sys/module/acpi
/sys/module/acpi/parameters/acpica_version
/sys/module/libata/parameters/noacpi

root@jan ~ # find /sys/ -name \*battery\*
/sys/bus/acpi/drivers/battery
/sys/module/battery

I have to boot with 'nolapic' to not run into a 10000+ wakeup/s issue but those notes above were made without 'nolapic'.


- Jan

Re: No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

[Len Brown]

On Friday 14 December 2007 12:42, Jan Willies wrote:

> ACPI: Table DSDT replaced by host OS

Sorry, can't help you if you are running a modified BIOS.

-Len

Re: No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

[Jan Willies]

Len Brown wrote:
> On Friday 14 December 2007 12:42, Jan Willies wrote:
> 
>> ACPI: Table DSDT replaced by host OS
> 
> Sorry, can't help you if you are running a modified BIOS.

Uh sorry, I totally forgot about that. It's just some compile errors fixed with intel compiler [1] and a little undervolting [2], don't know if it matters at all. Here is a clean log:

 BIOS-e820: 0000000037f40000 - 0000000037f50000 (ACPI data)
 BIOS-e820: 0000000037f50000 - 0000000038000000 (ACPI NVS)
ACPI: RSDP 000F8360, 0014 (r0 MSI   )
ACPI: RSDT 37F40000, 003C (r1 MSI    1013      9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: FACP 37F40200, 0081 (r2 MSI    1013      9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: DSDT 37F403F0, 31EC (r1    MSI     1013  9262005 INTL  2002026)
ACPI: FACS 37F50000, 0040
ACPI: APIC 37F40300, 0054 (r1 MSI    OEMAPIC   9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: WDRT 37F40360, 0047 (r1 MSI    MSI_OEM   9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: MCFG 37F403B0, 003C (r1 MSI    OEMMCFG   9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: SSDT 37F435E0, 002B (r1 OEM_ID OEMTBLID        1 INTL  2002026)
ACPI: OEMB 37F50040, 0049 (r1 MSI    MSI_OEM   9262005 MSFT       97)
ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x4008
ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 21 low level)
ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
ACPI: Core revision 20070126
ACPI: bus type pci registered
ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S5)
ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
ACPI: EC: GPE = 0x6, I/O: command/status = 0x66, data = 0x62
ACPI: EC: driver started in poll mode
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P1._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.POP2._PRT]
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled.
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 5 6 7 *10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs *5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 5 *6 7 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 5 6 *7 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs *5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) *0, disabled.
pnp: PnP ACPI init
ACPI: bus type pnp registered
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24 
ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode
pnp: PnP ACPI: found 11 devices
ACPI: ACPI bus type pnp unregistered
PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
ACPI: RTC can wake from S4
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:04.0[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:04.1[B] -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:14.6[B] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:00:14.6 disabled
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:14.1[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:03.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 20
ACPI: duty_cycle spans bit 4
ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3])
Time: acpi_pm clocksource has been installed.
ACPI: AC Adapter [ADP1] (on-line)
ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present)
ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF]
ACPI: Lid Switch [LID0]
ACPI: Sleep Button (CM) [SLPB]
ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB]
ACPI: Thermal Zone [THRM] (66 C)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:13.0[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:13.1[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:13.2[A] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:14.5[B] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:09.0[A] -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 22
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:01:05.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 18

What else information is needed?


Thanks for looking into it,

- Jan

[1] http://katherina.student.utwente.nl/~matthijs/cgi-bin/blosxom/Hardware/S270/BrandNew.html -> Fixing ACPI
[2] http://katherina.student.utwente.nl/~matthijs/cgi-bin/blosxom/Hardware/S270/Undervolting.html

Re: No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, 15 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
> Len Brown wrote:
> > On Friday 14 December 2007 12:42, Jan Willies wrote:
> > 
> >> ACPI: Table DSDT replaced by host OS
> > 
> > Sorry, can't help you if you are running a modified BIOS.
> 
> Uh sorry, I totally forgot about that. It's just some compile errors fixed with intel compiler [1] and a little undervolting [2], don't know if it matters at all. Here is a clean log:
[--snip--]
> What else information is needed?

Have you tested the latest Linus' tree?  We've had some ACPI fixes recently.

Greetings,
Rafael

Re: No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

[Jan Willies]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
>> Len Brown wrote:
>>> On Friday 14 December 2007 12:42, Jan Willies wrote:
>>>
>>>> ACPI: Table DSDT replaced by host OS
>>> Sorry, can't help you if you are running a modified BIOS.
>> Uh sorry, I totally forgot about that. It's just some compile errors fixed with intel compiler [1] and a little undervolting [2], don't know if it matters at all. Here is a clean log:
> [--snip--]
>> What else information is needed?
> 
> Have you tested the latest Linus' tree?  We've had some ACPI fixes recently.

Latest as in 2.6.24-rc5-git3? Because I can't see any acpi changes in the shortlog [1] since 2.6.24-rc5.


- Jan

[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=shortlog

Re: No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, 16 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 15 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
> >> Len Brown wrote:
> >>> On Friday 14 December 2007 12:42, Jan Willies wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> ACPI: Table DSDT replaced by host OS
> >>> Sorry, can't help you if you are running a modified BIOS.
> >> Uh sorry, I totally forgot about that. It's just some compile errors fixed with intel compiler [1] and a little undervolting [2], don't know if it matters at all. Here is a clean log:
> > [--snip--]
> >> What else information is needed?
> > 
> > Have you tested the latest Linus' tree?  We've had some ACPI fixes recently.
> 
> Latest as in 2.6.24-rc5-git3?

Yes.

> Because I can't see any acpi changes in the shortlog [1] since 2.6.24-rc5. 

Well, not that recently ...

Re: No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

[Jan Willies]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 15 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
>>>> Len Brown wrote:
>>>>> On Friday 14 December 2007 12:42, Jan Willies wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ACPI: Table DSDT replaced by host OS
>>>>> Sorry, can't help you if you are running a modified BIOS.
>>>> Uh sorry, I totally forgot about that. It's just some compile errors fixed with intel compiler [1] and a little undervolting [2], don't know if it matters at all. Here is a clean log:
>>> [--snip--]
>>>> What else information is needed?
>>> Have you tested the latest Linus' tree?  We've had some ACPI fixes recently.
>> Latest as in 2.6.24-rc5-git3?
> 
> Yes.

No change with 2.6.24-rc5-git3. I used the tarball from [1], shortlog says last changes were made 3 days ago. I don't know if that is 'recently' enough?


- Jan

[1] http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.24-rc5-git3.bz2

Re: No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

[Alexey Starikovskiy]

Jan Willies wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>   
>> On Sunday, 16 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
>>     
>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Saturday, 15 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Len Brown wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On Friday 14 December 2007 12:42, Jan Willies wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> ACPI: Table DSDT replaced by host OS
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Sorry, can't help you if you are running a modified BIOS.
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Uh sorry, I totally forgot about that. It's just some compile errors fixed with intel compiler [1] and a little undervolting [2], don't know if it matters at all. Here is a clean log:
>>>>>           
>>>> [--snip--]
>>>>         
>>>>> What else information is needed?
>>>>>           
>>>> Have you tested the latest Linus' tree?  We've had some ACPI fixes recently.
>>>>         
>>> Latest as in 2.6.24-rc5-git3?
>>>       
>> Yes.
>>     
>
> No change with 2.6.24-rc5-git3. I used the tarball from [1], shortlog says last changes were made 3 days ago. I don't know if that is 'recently' enough?
>
>
> - Jan
>
> [1] http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.24-rc5-git3.bz2
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>   

Jan,
Please open bug at bugzilla.kernel.org, and append acpidump output, full 
dmesg and .config from your kernel.


Thanks,
Alex.

Re: No battery status with 2.6.24-rcX anymore

[Jan Willies]

Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Jan Willies wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 16 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, 15 of December 2007, Jan Willies wrote:
>>>>>> Len Brown wrote:
>>>>>>> On Friday 14 December 2007 12:42, Jan Willies wrote:
>>>>>>>            
>>>>>>>> ACPI: Table DSDT replaced by host OS
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> Sorry, can't help you if you are running a modified BIOS.
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>> Uh sorry, I totally forgot about that. It's just some compile
>>>>>> errors fixed with intel compiler [1] and a little undervolting
>>>>>> [2], don't know if it matters at all. Here is a clean log:
>>>>>>           
>>>>> [--snip--]
>>>>>        
>>>>>> What else information is needed?
>>>>>>           
>>>>> Have you tested the latest Linus' tree?  We've had some ACPI fixes
>>>>> recently.
>>>>>         
>>>> Latest as in 2.6.24-rc5-git3?
>>>>       
>>> Yes.
>>
>> No change with 2.6.24-rc5-git3. I used the tarball from [1], shortlog
>> says last changes were made 3 days ago. I don't know if that is
>> 'recently' enough?
> 
> Jan,
> Please open bug at bugzilla.kernel.org, and append acpidump output, full
> dmesg and .config from your kernel.

it's done: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585


cheers

- Jan