From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephane Ascoet Subject: Re: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path: the SCSI case Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:43:49 +0100 Message-ID: <476F0ED5.3090609@free.fr> References: <4745F77C.7040402@gmail.com> <47511751.2010707@gmail.com> <47514CE2.3000600@gmail.com> <200712051124.18852.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp25.orange.fr ([193.252.22.23]:37420 "EHLO smtp25.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751140AbXLWXjC (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:39:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200712051124.18852.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Jiri Slaby , Andrew Morton , matthew@wil.cx, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, drzeus@drzeus.cx, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Adam Belay , Matthieu Castet , Li Shaohua , Len Brown Bjorn Helgaas a =E9crit : > Good. It's not clear to me whether it is safe to leave devices > enabled while we sleep. I don't see an actual problem, but there > might be something related to hotplug while we're asleep or something= =2E > So I'll cc: some additional people who might have some insight. Hi, is there a chance for SCSI sleeping being managed by ACPI(it seems=20 to be the case for IDE)? --=20 Bien cordialement, Stephane Ascoet, conseils pour que la technologie=20 soit un progres respectueux de la vie. Album photo: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html