From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: add sysfs serial number Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:15:07 +0300 Message-ID: <479632AB.2030709@suse.de> References: <1201024010-6103-1-git-send-email-max@stro.at> <47962F29.7000102@suse.de> <20080122180724.GB5009@baikonur.stro.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from charybdis-ext.suse.de ([195.135.221.2]:41180 "EHLO emea5-mh.id5.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751696AbYAVSPz (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:15:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080122180724.GB5009@baikonur.stro.at> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: maximilian attems Cc: Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:00:09PM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: >> ACK > > thanks for your quick response! > > while checking the missing bits of ACPI_SYSFS_POWER versus > ACPI_PROCFS_POWER i also noticed capacity granularity. > is that used by anyone? IMHO, nobody cares about it. > > if yes i can send another patch for that too. SBS (sbs.c) has cycle_count field, which might be useful too, so you might want to show it as well. > want to switch debian to ACPI_SYSFS_POWER. Good luck!