From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:42:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F12289.4030300@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803290001.18912.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 28 of March 2008, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:09:22PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>>> On Friday 28 March 2008, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
>>>> You should have a dmesg line which looks like
>>>> ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2]
>>>> Do you see C2 in such line?
>>> Yes:
>>>
>>> ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2])
>>
>> David,
>>
>> I think I figured out the bug...
>>
>> Can you try the below patch and confirm that it works (over upstream - ignore
>> the earlier revert patch I sent to you).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Venki
>>
>> ----
>>
>>
>> Patch to fix huge number of wakeups reported due to recent changes in
>> processor_idle.c. The problem was that the entry_method determination was
>> broken due to one of the recent commits (bc71bec91f987) causing
>> C1 entry to not to go to halt. This should also fix the hang reported here.
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093
>
> Ah, thanks for figuring that out. As a regression fix, it should go upstream
> ASAP, I think.
..
Would this have any applicability to 2.6.24 as well?
I have seen/reported a similar bug there many times in the past,
with no resolution. There's even a bugzilla entry for it somewhere.
???
>> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c 2008-03-28 15:31:13.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c 2008-03-28 15:40:50.000000000 -0700
>> @@ -848,6 +848,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_power_info
>> /* all processors need to support C1 */
>> pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C1].type = ACPI_STATE_C1;
>> pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C1].valid = 1;
>> + pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C1].entry_method = ACPI_CSTATE_HALT;
>> }
>> /* the C0 state only exists as a filler in our array */
>> pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C0].valid = 1;
>> @@ -960,6 +961,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_power_info
>> cx.address);
>> }
>>
>> + if (cx.type == ACPI_STATE_C1) {
>> + cx.valid = 1;
>> + }
>>
>> obj = &(element->package.elements[2]);
>> if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-31 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080322202454.9D69DCC0EF@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
2008-03-23 0:35 ` 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec Andrew Morton
2008-03-23 18:04 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-03-28 19:01 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 19:13 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 19:44 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 20:30 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 21:09 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 21:55 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 22:09 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 22:56 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 23:07 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-31 17:42 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2008-03-31 18:34 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 23:36 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 23:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-29 0:15 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F12289.4030300@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox