From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Subject: Re: 2.6.25 pci=noacpi Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:17:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4816CBA1.4050907@gmail.com> References: <20080425183807.366134771@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20080425183934.516655076@ldl.fc.hp.com> <4813B5AB.4060308@keyaccess.nl> <200804281507.38309.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <4816C605.4000601@gmail.com> <20080429000411.ce73230f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]:42602 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753344AbYD2HSC (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:18:02 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1058317ugc.16 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:17:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080429000411.ce73230f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adam Belay , Adam M Belay , Li Shaohua , Matthieu Castet , Thomas Renninger , Jaroslav Kysela Hi Andrew/all A stock standard 2.6.24 kernel worked fine, but it exhibited a problem where the timer sources didnt run as expected. ( I didnt put too much effort in to it as I wanted a hot off the press kernel ) in 2.6.24 the ACPI done its job :-) I am going to enable netconsole to try see if it can throw me a bone. Thanks, Richard Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:53:57 +0100 Richard wrote: > > >> Hi all, >> >> Using an AMD Sempron notebook (HP Compaq 6715b) single processor >> machine, It shuts down during bootup when ACPI is fully enabled. I >> added pci=noacpi to the cmdline and it finally boots, but its extremely >> slow... (kdm times out with error saying it took too long to load and >> disables graphical) >> >> Dmesg doest show anything out of the ordinary, irq_stats only shows the >> timer interrupts being incremented. (noirq also works, but same >> behaviour) Can someone please offer me some pointers so I can fault find >> this problem. >> >> > > Did any earlier kernels work OK? If so, which versions? > > Thanks. > >