From: Thomas Jaeger <thjaeger@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>, Adam M Belay <abelay@mit.edu>,
Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Robert Moore <Robert.Moore@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PNPACPI: use _CRS IRQ descriptor length for _SRS
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 14:55:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48386498.6010006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805231629.24421.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [This fixes a long-standing parport PNPACPI bug, and it would
> nice to have it in 2.6.26.]
>
I agree, especially since the ground work has already been laid in
1d5b285da1893b90507b081664ac27f1a8a3dc5b.
> @@ -799,11 +802,14 @@ static void pnpacpi_encode_irq(struct pn
> irq->sharable = ACPI_SHARED;
> irq->interrupt_count = 1;
> irq->interrupts[0] = p->start;
> + irq->descriptor_length = resource->data.irq.descriptor_length;
>
I don't understand the point of this line. Aren't
irq->descriptor_length and resource->data.irq.descriptor_length the same
thing?
Bjorn, while we're on the subject, could you have a look at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487#c32 ? I've noticed that
you've already fixed the third point there; the other two points may
well be irrelevant or never occur in practice, but then they could be
the sort of thing that costs somebody hours of debugging time.
Thanks,
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-24 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-23 22:29 PNPACPI: use _CRS IRQ descriptor length for _SRS Bjorn Helgaas
2008-05-24 18:55 ` Thomas Jaeger [this message]
2008-05-27 16:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-05-27 16:53 ` PNPACPI: use _CRS IRQ descriptor length for _SRS, v2 Bjorn Helgaas
2008-06-09 18:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-06-09 22:02 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48386498.6010006@gmail.com \
--to=thjaeger@gmail.com \
--cc=Robert.Moore@intel.com \
--cc=abelay@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ambx1@neo.rr.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox