From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:08:35 +0200 Message-ID: <48789EC3.2070701@firstfloor.org> References: <200807010148.02135.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080701063133.GC16642@elte.hu> <4869D4A3.3020000@zytor.com> <200807012239.44105.rjw@sisk.pl> <486A96C1.2020106@firstfloor.org> <48784F51.1010407@myrealbox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:38962 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752352AbYGLMIt (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:08:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48784F51.1010407@myrealbox.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML , pm list , Pavel Machek Andy Lutomirski wrote: > My Lenovo X61s fails to resume if I suspend it from within X, on both > 2.6.26-rc9 and recent wireless-testing. 2.6.26-rc8 is fine, as is > wireless-testing with 4b4f7280 reverted. My in-progress bisect between > -rc8 and -rc9 is also consistent with this being the problem. With "this" do you mean the patch being applied or not applied? As in does it fail with the patch applied? You can confirm that by only applying the patch and testing. -Andi