From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI updates Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:47:07 +0200 Message-ID: <487EEAEB.4050009@firstfloor.org> References: <20080716214516.GA10777@basil.nowhere.org> <200807170011.12184.rjw@sisk.pl> <200807161633.01375.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:60805 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751296AbYGQGrL (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:47:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200807161633.01375.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jesse Barnes Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 3:11 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday, 16 of July 2008, Andi Kleen wrote: >>> Linus, >>> >>> Please pull from >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-acpi-merge-2.6 >>> release-2.6.27 >>> >>> to get the initial ACPI updates for 2.6.27. We got a few more changes >>> dependent on yet unpulled trees and some other candidate patches, >>> but that's the bulk for the changes intended for 2.6.27. Most of that >>> has been collected by Len Brown before he went on sabbatical. I was >>> relatively conservative with additional changes so far. >> Well, IMO it would be better to merge PCI first. > > Yeah, they're interdependent (I pulled from Len's tree, hopefully Andi > preserved the changesets). I had wanted to do a little more testing of what > I've got, but I haven't heard any huge complaints so far so maybe things are > ok. I'll generate a pull request now. Hmm, but if you're dependent ACPI needs to go in first anyways, doesn't it? I don't think the ACPI tree is dependent on PCI at least. Or at least I didn't notice any problems in this area. -Andi