From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Avoid critical temp shutdowns on specific ThinkPad T4x(p) and R50p Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:00:26 +0200 Message-ID: <48A1431A.8090300@linux.intel.com> References: <200807301556.01815.trenn@suse.de> <200808111433.25275.trenn@suse.de> <20080811125519.GA26308@srcf.ucam.org> <200808111614.17161.trenn@suse.de> <20080811141552.GA28294@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89]:60375 "EHLO fmsmga101.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751670AbYHLIAY (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:00:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080811141552.GA28294@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Thomas Renninger , Zhang Rui , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > >> So what is the status here, how should we proceed? >> This isn't applied to any tree yet? >> IMO you should send those two with below fixed and Andi could queue them on >> the test branch and keep it a while there. > > I posted them, got a small amount of feedback and no further acks. I can > push them again. The problem seems to be that some people report this as a regression. So either: - It's not actually an regression but has always been this way. In this case it's fine to delay. - It's an regression. Then something must have been changed. Do we know what that is? If it's really an regression then we need a low-risk fix for .27. -Andi