From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
To: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: RFC: fast transactions in EC [was: a problem about the two patches in bug 10724 & 11428]
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:55:45 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48BF07E1.8080304@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1220430856.4007.38.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7108 bytes --]
Hi,
Here is the patch, which moves almost all transaction functionality into interrupt handler, which is IMHO good.
with the enabled DEBUG, the interrupt picture looks like this (single transaction):
[ 228.823886] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x08 -- this is a check for IBF=0 before starting transaction
[ 228.823888] ACPI: EC: transaction start
[ 228.823890] ACPI: EC: <--- command = 0x80 -- here we write command
[ 228.824123] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt -- this interrupt is generated with the same content in status register as before writing a command...
[ 228.824127] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x08
[ 228.824129] ACPI: EC: <--- data = 0x58
[ 228.824152] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt -- and now EC start sending us interrupts like crazy...
[ 228.824155] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824169] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824172] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824186] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824189] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824203] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824206] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824219] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824222] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824236] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824239] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824253] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824256] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824270] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824273] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824287] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824290] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824304] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824307] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824321] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824324] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824337] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824340] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824354] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824357] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824371] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824374] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824388] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824391] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824405] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824408] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824422] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824425] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824439] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824442] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824455] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824458] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824472] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824475] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824489] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824492] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824506] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824509] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824523] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824526] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824540] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824543] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824557] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824560] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824573] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824576] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824590] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824593] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824607] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824610] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824624] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824627] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824641] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824644] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824658] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824661] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824675] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824678] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824691] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824694] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824708] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824711] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x02
[ 228.824785] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt --- one more "real" interrupt. Others are just garbage.
[ 228.824788] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x01
[ 228.824791] ACPI: EC: ---> data = 0x35
[ 228.824805] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824808] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824822] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824825] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824839] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824842] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824856] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824859] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824873] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824876] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824890] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824893] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824907] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824910] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824924] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824926] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824940] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824943] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824957] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824960] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824974] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824977] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.824991] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.824994] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825008] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825011] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825025] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825028] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825042] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825044] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825058] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825061] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825075] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825078] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825092] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825095] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825109] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825112] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825126] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825129] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825143] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825146] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825160] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825162] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825176] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825179] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825193] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825196] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825210] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825213] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825227] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825230] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825244] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825247] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825261] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825264] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825277] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825280] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825294] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825297] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825311] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825314] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825328] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825331] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825345] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825348] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825362] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825365] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825379] ACPI: EC: ~~~> interrupt
[ 228.825381] ACPI: EC: ---> status = 0x00
[ 228.825387] ACPI: EC: transaction end
"transaction end" happens to be printed than EC stops sending interrupts. It looks like we get 100% interrupt load for 1ms or so...
This piece does not have 0x20 (SCI) bit set, so it is not a query issue.
I'm out of ideas, so if you have some, please speak up.
Also, Intel wants back this problematic notebook in 2 weeks, so I will not be able to debug it afterwards.
Regards,
Alex.
[-- Attachment #2: fast_transaction.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 8862 bytes --]
ACPI: EC: do transaction from interrupt context
From: <>
It is easier and faster to do transaction directly from interrupt context
rather than waking control thread.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
---
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index bdc9b6b..0167b93 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -65,18 +65,11 @@ enum ec_command {
ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY = 0x84,
};
-/* EC events */
-enum ec_event {
- ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1 = 1, /* Output buffer full */
- ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBF_0, /* Input buffer empty */
-};
-
#define ACPI_EC_DELAY 500 /* Wait 500ms max. during EC ops */
#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_GLK 1000 /* Wait 1ms max. to get global lock */
#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY 100 /* Wait 100us before polling EC again */
enum {
- EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE = 0, /* Don't check status until GPE arrives */
EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, /* Query is pending */
EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, /* Expect GPE to be sent for status change */
EC_FLAGS_NO_GPE, /* Don't use GPE mode */
@@ -95,6 +88,14 @@ struct acpi_ec_query_handler {
u8 query_bit;
};
+struct transaction_data {
+ const u8 *wdata;
+ u8 *rdata;
+ u8 command;
+ u8 wlen;
+ u8 rlen;
+};
+
static struct acpi_ec {
acpi_handle handle;
unsigned long gpe;
@@ -106,6 +107,7 @@ static struct acpi_ec {
wait_queue_head_t wait;
struct list_head list;
struct delayed_work work;
+ struct transaction_data t;
atomic_t irq_count;
u8 handlers_installed;
} *boot_ec, *first_ec;
@@ -152,13 +154,13 @@ static inline u8 acpi_ec_read_data(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
u8 x = inb(ec->data_addr);
pr_debug(PREFIX "---> data = 0x%2.2x\n", x);
- return inb(ec->data_addr);
+ return x;
}
static inline void acpi_ec_write_cmd(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command)
{
pr_debug(PREFIX "<--- command = 0x%2.2x\n", command);
- outb(command, ec->command_addr);
+ outb((ec->t.command = command), ec->command_addr);
}
static inline void acpi_ec_write_data(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 data)
@@ -167,21 +169,6 @@ static inline void acpi_ec_write_data(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 data)
outb(data, ec->data_addr);
}
-static inline int acpi_ec_check_status(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event)
-{
- if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags))
- return 0;
- if (event == ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1) {
- if (acpi_ec_read_status(ec) & ACPI_EC_FLAG_OBF)
- return 1;
- } else if (event == ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBF_0) {
- if (!(acpi_ec_read_status(ec) & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF))
- return 1;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static void ec_schedule_ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_RESCHEDULE_POLL, &ec->flags))
@@ -189,47 +176,45 @@ static void ec_schedule_ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY));
}
-static void ec_switch_to_poll_mode(struct acpi_ec *ec)
-{
- set_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_GPE, &ec->flags);
- clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags);
- acpi_disable_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe, ACPI_NOT_ISR);
- set_bit(EC_FLAGS_RESCHEDULE_POLL, &ec->flags);
+static int ec_transaction_done(struct acpi_ec *ec) {
+ if (!ec->t.command)
+ return 1;
+ if (!ec->t.wlen && !ec->t.rlen)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
}
-static int acpi_ec_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event, int force_poll)
+static void gpe_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 status)
{
- atomic_set(&ec->irq_count, 0);
- if (likely(test_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags)) &&
- likely(!force_poll)) {
- if (wait_event_timeout(ec->wait, acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event),
- msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY)))
- return 0;
- clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
- if (acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event)) {
- /* missing GPEs, switch back to poll mode */
- if (printk_ratelimit())
- pr_info(PREFIX "missing confirmations, "
- "switch off interrupt mode.\n");
- ec_switch_to_poll_mode(ec);
- ec_schedule_ec_poll(ec);
- return 0;
+ if (!ec->t.command)
+ return;
+ if (ec->t.wlen > 0) {
+ if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0) {
+ acpi_ec_write_data(ec, *(ec->t.wdata++));
+ --ec->t.wlen;
}
- } else {
- unsigned long delay = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY);
- clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
- while (time_before(jiffies, delay)) {
- if (acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event))
- return 0;
- msleep(1);
+ } else if (ec->t.rlen > 0) {
+ if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_OBF) == 1) {
+ *(ec->t.rdata++) = acpi_ec_read_data(ec);
+ --ec->t.rlen;
}
- if (acpi_ec_check_status(ec,event))
- return 0;
}
- pr_err(PREFIX "acpi_ec_wait timeout, status = 0x%2.2x, event = %s\n",
- acpi_ec_read_status(ec),
- (event == ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1) ? "\"b0=1\"" : "\"b1=0\"");
- return -ETIME;
+}
+
+static void acpi_ec_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+{
+ if (wait_event_timeout(ec->wait, ec_transaction_done(ec),
+ msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY)))
+ return;
+ /* missing GPEs, switch back to poll mode */
+ if (printk_ratelimit())
+ pr_info(PREFIX "missing confirmations, "
+ "switch off interrupt mode.\n");
+#if 0
+ set_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_GPE, &ec->flags);
+ clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags);
+#endif
+ return;
}
static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
@@ -237,45 +222,33 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
u8 * rdata, unsigned rdata_len,
int force_poll)
{
- int result = 0;
- set_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
pr_debug(PREFIX "transaction start\n");
+ ec->t.wdata = wdata;
+ ec->t.wlen = wdata_len;
+ ec->t.rdata = rdata;
+ ec->t.rlen = rdata_len;
acpi_ec_write_cmd(ec, command);
- for (; wdata_len > 0; --wdata_len) {
- result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBF_0, force_poll);
- if (result) {
- pr_err(PREFIX
- "write_cmd timeout, command = %d\n", command);
- goto end;
- }
- set_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
- acpi_ec_write_data(ec, *(wdata++));
- }
-
- if (!rdata_len) {
- result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBF_0, force_poll);
- if (result) {
- pr_err(PREFIX
- "finish-write timeout, command = %d\n", command);
- goto end;
- }
- } else if (command == ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY)
- clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags);
-
- for (; rdata_len > 0; --rdata_len) {
- result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1, force_poll);
- if (result) {
- pr_err(PREFIX "read timeout, command = %d\n", command);
- goto end;
+ if (!force_poll && test_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags))
+ acpi_ec_wait(ec);
+ else {
+ unsigned long delay = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY);
+ while (time_before(jiffies, delay)) {
+ gpe_transaction(ec, acpi_ec_read_status(ec));
+ if (ec_transaction_done(ec))
+ goto end;
+ udelay(5);
}
- /* Don't expect GPE after last read */
- if (rdata_len > 1)
- set_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
- *(rdata++) = acpi_ec_read_data(ec);
}
- end:
+end:
pr_debug(PREFIX "transaction end\n");
- return result;
+ ec->t.command = 0;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int ec_check_ibf0(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+{
+ u8 status = acpi_ec_read_status(ec);
+ return (status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0;
}
static int acpi_ec_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
@@ -301,8 +274,8 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
}
}
- status = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_IBF_0, 0);
- if (status) {
+ if (!wait_event_timeout(ec->wait, ec_check_ibf0(ec),
+ msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY))) {
pr_err(PREFIX "input buffer is not empty, "
"aborting transaction\n");
goto end;
@@ -439,6 +412,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 * data)
*/
result = acpi_ec_transaction(ec, ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY, NULL, 0, &d, 1, 0);
+ clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags);
if (result)
return result;
@@ -517,19 +491,13 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(void *data)
{
acpi_status status = AE_OK;
struct acpi_ec *ec = data;
- u8 state = acpi_ec_read_status(ec);
- static bool warn_done = 0;
+ u8 state;
pr_debug(PREFIX "~~~> interrupt\n");
- atomic_inc(&ec->irq_count);
- if (!warn_done && atomic_read(&ec->irq_count) > 5) {
- pr_warning(PREFIX "GPE storm detected, try to use ec_intr=0 "
- "kernel option, if you see problems with keyboard.\n");
- warn_done = 1;
- goto end;
- }
- clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
- if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags))
+ state = acpi_ec_read_status(ec);
+
+ gpe_transaction(ec, state);
+ if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0)
wake_up(&ec->wait);
if (state & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI) {
@@ -546,7 +514,6 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(void *data)
set_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags);
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_RESCHEDULE_POLL, &ec->flags);
}
-end:
ec_schedule_ec_poll(ec);
return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ?
ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED : ACPI_INTERRUPT_NOT_HANDLED;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-01 6:40 a problem about the two patches in bug 10724 & 11428 Zhao Yakui
2008-09-01 7:49 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-01 9:55 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-01 12:18 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-02 1:59 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-02 8:36 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-02 9:31 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-02 9:26 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-09-02 9:30 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-02 10:00 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-01 12:21 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-01 12:52 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-01 20:35 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-01 20:59 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-02 1:03 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-02 2:03 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-09-02 3:39 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-02 9:19 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-09-02 8:05 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-03 6:02 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-03 6:46 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-03 7:28 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-03 8:03 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-03 7:53 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-03 8:34 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-03 21:55 ` Alexey Starikovskiy [this message]
2008-09-04 2:58 ` RFC: fast transactions in EC [was: a problem about the two patches in bug 10724 & 11428] Zhao Yakui
2008-09-04 3:06 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-04 3:56 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-04 4:51 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-05 20:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-08 8:19 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-08 8:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-08 8:30 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-08 8:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 22:28 ` a problem about the two patches in bug 10724 & 11428 Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-04 3:43 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-04 3:47 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-09-04 6:00 ` Zhao Yakui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48BF07E1.8080304@suse.de \
--to=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox