From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Jenkins Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] acpi: Avoid dropping rapid hotkey events (or other GPEs) on Asus EeePC Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:30:41 +0100 Message-ID: <48D78FF1.9060502@tuffmail.co.uk> References: <48D695B3.5000303@tuffmail.co.uk> <48D69DC9.5060100@suse.de> <48D760A2.3030007@tuffmail.co.uk> <48D77B3C.8070103@tuffmail.co.uk> <48D7833A.9030207@suse.de> <48D78658.2090209@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.25]:38545 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751733AbYIVMas (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:30:48 -0400 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so406109eyi.37 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:30:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48D78658.2090209@gmail.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Starikovskiy Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy , linux acpi Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Here are the patches. First is updated version of patch you've tried, > second is > even more aggressive disabling of GPEs (applies on top). > > Please check them. > I tested them together and they worked, yay! That doesn't say anything about the second patch. My EC didn't generate enough spurious interrupts to trigger the STORM code. Would you welcome some nitpicks on the first patch at this time? I didn't see errors but I have some code-style queries. Thanks Alan