From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] acpi: Avoid dropping rapid hotkey events (or other GPEs) on Asus EeePC Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:35:44 +0400 Message-ID: <48D79120.2050309@gmail.com> References: <48D695B3.5000303@tuffmail.co.uk> <48D69DC9.5060100@suse.de> <48D760A2.3030007@tuffmail.co.uk> <48D77B3C.8070103@tuffmail.co.uk> <48D7833A.9030207@suse.de> <48D78658.2090209@gmail.com> <48D78FF1.9060502@tuffmail.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.24]:37149 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751815AbYIVMfx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:35:53 -0400 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so406837eyi.37 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:35:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48D78FF1.9060502@tuffmail.co.uk> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Jenkins Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy , linux acpi Alan Jenkins wrote: > Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > >> Hi Alan, >> >> Here are the patches. First is updated version of patch you've tried, >> second is >> even more aggressive disabling of GPEs (applies on top). >> >> Please check them. >> >> > I tested them together and they worked, yay! > > That doesn't say anything about the second patch. My EC didn't generate > enough spurious interrupts to trigger the STORM code. > > Would you welcome some nitpicks on the first patch at this time? I > didn't see errors but I have some code-style queries. > Sure. Will be glad. > Thanks > Alan >