From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: acpi-test tree on eeepc: EC error message on second resume
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:12:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F0DE8C.6040309@tuffmail.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810111909.48897.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 11 of October 2008, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>
>> I've just run an acpi-test kernel on my EeePC and noticed a new issue.
>> It seems to be caused (or revealed) by the EC interrupt transaction patch.
>>
>> On the second suspend/resume cycle, I see a kernel error message.
>>
>> [ 78.747707] ACPI: Waking up from system sleep state S3
>> [ 79.330001] ACPI: EC: input buffer not empty, aborting transaction
>> [ 79.423327] ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to
>> interrupt mode
>>
>> I still don't see any issues in the code. I'll try getting a DEBUG
>> trace to see the EC interrupts. Any other suggestions?
>>
>
> Not really, but is this reproducible? I mean, does it happen always on the
> second resume and does it happen on every next resume after the first one?
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
Ah. No, I spoke to soon. It happened on the second resume the first
two times I tried it. But this third time with DEBUG enabled, it
happened on the first suspend/resume.
And it doesn't happen on all subsequent resumes either. I've had one
suspend/resume without the error, just after a suspend/resume with the
error.
So it's not deterministic, but it is easy to reproduce.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-11 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-11 16:57 acpi-test tree on eeepc: EC error message on second resume Alan Jenkins
2008-10-11 17:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 17:12 ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2008-10-11 17:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 18:15 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-11 18:39 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-11 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 19:31 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-11 19:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 19:38 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-11 20:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-12 9:13 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-12 19:23 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-13 5:56 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-10-13 8:22 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-13 16:39 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-15 22:02 ` [PATCH] ACPI: EC: Check for IBF=0 periodically if not in GPE mode Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-16 22:14 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48F0DE8C.6040309@tuffmail.co.uk \
--to=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox