public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>, LenBrown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <Linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ACPI Cleanup :Initialize EC global lock based on the return status
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:21:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4910140F.6010400@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811040958.18262.rjw@sisk.pl>

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 of November 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> NAK
> 
> Can you elaborate, a bit, please?
This patch does not fix anything, just adds several lines of code.
It appeared as a concurrent patch to 11917 bug several days later, what I don't understand completely.
If Yakui has nothing else to do, this is not _my_ problem.
ec->global_lock is zero before entering ec_parse_device (zero alloced as part of acpi_ec struct),
thus there is no need to set it explicitely once again.
We don't care if call to _GLK succeeds or not, this is reflected in current design, so there is
no need in inserting the check either.

Overall, "don't fix it if it is not broken".

Regards,
Alex.
> 
>> Zhao Yakui wrote:
>>> Subject: ACPI: Cleanup :Initialize EC global lock based on the return status
>>> From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Initialize the EC global lock based on the returned value of _GLK object.
>>> Only when AE_OK is returned by the acpi_evaluate_integer, the EC global lock
>>> will be assigned based on the return value of _GLK object.Otherwise it means
>>> that there is no _GLK object and the global lock won't be required when EC
>>> is accessed.
>>> If the return value of _GLK object is not zero, it means that GLobal lock
>>> will be required when EC is accessed.
>>> If the return value of _GLK object is zero, it means that GLobal lock
>>> won't be required when EC is accessed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
>>> cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
>>> cc: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/acpi/ec.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>>> @@ -752,8 +752,28 @@ ec_parse_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 
>>>  	ec->gpe = tmp;
>>>  	/* Use the global lock for all EC transactions? */
>>>  	tmp = 0;
>>> -	acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GLK", NULL, &tmp);
>>> -	ec->global_lock = tmp;
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Only when AE_OK is returned by acpi_evaluate_interger,
>>> +	 * the ec->global_lock will be assigned based on the returned
>>> +	 * value by _GLK. Otherwise it means that there is no _GLK object
>>> +	 * and global lock won't be required when EC is accessed.
>>> +	 * If the return value of _GLK object is not zero, it means that
>>> +	 * global lock will be required when EC is accessed.
>>> +	 * If the return value of _GLK object is zero, it means that
>>> +	 * global lock won't be required when EC is accessed.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GLK", NULL, &tmp);
>>> +	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * If the return value is not zero, it means that global lock
>>> +		 * is required when EC is accessed
>>> +		 */
>>> +		if (tmp)
>>> +			ec->global_lock = 1;
>>> +		else
>>> +			ec->global_lock = 0;
>>> +	} else
>>> +		ec->global_lock = 0;
>>>  	ec->handle = handle;
>>>  	return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
>>>  }
>>>
>>>


  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-04  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-31 18:42 [PATCH] ACPI: EC: clean up tmp variable before reuse Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-11-03  8:02 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-11-03  8:24 ` [PATCH]: ACPI: Initialize EC global lock based on the return value of _GLK Zhao Yakui
2008-11-04  7:41 ` [PATCH]: ACPI Cleanup :Initialize EC global lock based on the return status Zhao Yakui
2008-11-04  8:05   ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-11-04  8:58     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04  9:21       ` Alexey Starikovskiy [this message]
2008-11-04  9:37     ` Zhao Yakui
2008-11-04  9:38       ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-11-05  1:05         ` Zhao Yakui
2008-11-05  7:24           ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-12-17  8:55 ` [PATCH] : ACPI : Use RSDT instead of XSDT by adding boot option of "acpi=rsdt" Zhao Yakui
2009-01-09  6:35   ` Len Brown
2009-01-09 10:54     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-09 10:59       ` Len Brown
2009-01-09 12:16         ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-09 12:34           ` Matthew Garrett
2009-01-12 14:13             ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-12 14:16               ` Matthew Garrett
2009-01-12 22:17                 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-12 23:38                   ` Matthew Garrett
2009-01-09 10:58   ` Blacklist known broken machines to use the rsdt and enabled Cstates on R40e Thomas Renninger
2009-01-09 10:58   ` [PATCH 1/2] Blacklist known broken machines (ThinkPad R40e and R50e) to use rsdt instead xsdt Thomas Renninger
2009-01-09 10:58   ` [PATCH 2/2] R40e using rsdt (previous patch) makes all Cstates work -> remove blacklisting Thomas Renninger
2008-12-30  4:01 ` [PATCH] : ACPI : Add the MWAIT C-state mask to avoid overflow Zhao Yakui
2009-01-04  4:04 ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-09  6:28   ` Len Brown
2009-01-12  7:07 ` [PATCH] : ACPI : Use clocksource to get the C-state time instead of ACPI PM timer Zhao Yakui
2009-01-12  7:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-12  9:31     ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-12 12:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-12  9:39     ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-12 22:09   ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-13  1:26     ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-13  1:42     ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-13  3:50 ` [RESEND] " Zhao Yakui
2009-01-20  2:52   ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4910140F.6010400@suse.de \
    --to=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
    --cc=Linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox