From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Jenkins Subject: Re: eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:57:32 +0000 Message-ID: <491070EC.4030309@tuffmail.co.uk> References: <20081102040008.GB29606@khazad-dum.debian.net> <490D8C4E.3010201@tuffmail.co.uk> <20081102130655.GA12766@srcf.ucam.org> <20081103141628.GB31078@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20081103141836.GA31894@srcf.ucam.org> <490F0ACC.4000808@tuffmail.co.uk> <20081103145145.GD31078@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20081103145543.GA496@srcf.ucam.org> <20081103150229.GF31078@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20081103150843.GA1107@srcf.ucam.org> <20081103163311.GA2417@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20081104134832.6c596d54@doriath.conectiva> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:32858 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755923AbYKDP5j (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:57:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081104134832.6c596d54@doriath.conectiva> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Matthew Garrett , linux-kernel , linux acpi Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote: > Em Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:33:11 -0200 > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escreveu: > > | On Mon, 03 Nov 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote: > | > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 01:02:29PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > | > > Right now, you should still rfkill_force_state(). Please wait for an hour > | > > or two while I clean up that broken resume handling, and I will tell you for > | > > sure. > | > > | > Cool. I'll hold off posting my cleanups until then in that case. > | > | Ok, two bugs reproduced, the fixes are ready and tested, and I will be > | sending it now to linux-wireless. You're in the CC, so you will get them. > | > | I will also need to send patches for -stable, as the ones for mainline won't > | apply to -stable. > > Great. > > Do the patches have anything to do with the problem I have reported? > No. These patches don't affect what happens when the rfkill device is unregistered. > Rafael has opened a bugzilla ticket for it: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11928 >