From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 1/2] ACPI :Compare EC device in DSDT table with that in ECDT table Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:53:47 +0300 Message-ID: <4921857B.7000303@suse.de> References: <1226904541.4062.23.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com> <49212B22.5030202@suse.de> <1226914935.4062.67.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com> <49214B9C.6030204@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from charybdis-ext.suse.de ([195.135.221.2]:58005 "EHLO emea5-mh.id5.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752359AbYKQOxr (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:53:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49214B9C.6030204@gmail.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Starikovskiy Cc: Zhao Yakui , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "lenb@kernel.org" > Zhao Yakui wrote: >> b. On the laptops of bug 11880 all the info in ECDT table is >> incorrect. The EC GPE number and EC namepath are incorrect besides the >> EC Cmd/Status/Data I/O port. Actually, 11880 does not require any magic or comparison of DSDT and ECDT, you may just compare command and data addresses, and if they are the same, skip ECDT. > Regards, > Alex.