From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] PM: Use DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND conditionally
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:12:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4966939.GXAFRqVoOG@rjwysocki.net> (raw)
Hi Everyone,
This is a follow-up for the discussion on the patchset at
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2314745.iZASKD2KPV@rjwysocki.net/
that suggested an adjustment of the approach.
Accordingly, this series modifies the PM core and the users of
DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND to take it into account only if it is
consistently used in dependency graphs, as described in the
changelog of patch [3/3].
Patches [1-2/3] are preparatory and they arrange for the handling
of devices with no runtime PM support in a meaningful way.
Thanks!
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-17 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-17 20:12 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-02-17 20:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] PM: Block enabling of runtime PM during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-18 12:49 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-02-18 13:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-17 20:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] PM: runtime: Introduce pm_runtime_blocked() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-18 12:49 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-02-17 20:19 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] PM: sleep: Use DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND conditionally Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-18 12:48 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-02-18 13:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-18 14:39 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4966939.GXAFRqVoOG@rjwysocki.net \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox