Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> yes, that end result is the desired state of things. We did run with
>> this for several months and resolved all the cases that needed fixing,
>> but dropped them when the ACPI tree moved out from under us.
>>
>> Can resurrect it if Len feels OK about the concept. Len, you shouldnt
>> worry about conflicts - we can do it after the ACPI changes of this
>> merge window are upstream so there should be no conflict trouble at
>> all. How does that sound?
>>   
> 
> Doesn't look like these changes made it in this time.  Did they get
> overlooked, or did some other problem come up?  Or did you want me to
> dig them up?
> 
> Thanks,
>    J


please check attached that are updated to today tip/master with ingo's genapic patchset..

YH