public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Cc: linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] ACPI battery driver: odd usage of generic power supply class on battery removal
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 18:57:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A07159A.9010006@tuffmail.co.uk> (raw)

Hi,

The ACPI battery driver does something strange with the generic power 
supply class, when the battery is removed from my laptop.  Instead of 
clearing the "present" attribute of the class device, it removes the 
entire class device.

Can this be corrected, or is there a specific reason for it?

Patch follows for illustration purposes.

If this can be changed, I'd also try to cleanup acpi_battery_update().  
I don't think it's right that CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER affects the 
control flow.  When it's disabled, acpi_battery_present() is not tested 
before calling acpi_battery_get_state().  It might not cause any 
problems, but it is evil.

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index 69cbc57..050444a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -482,6 +482,11 @@ static int sysfs_add_battery(struct acpi_battery *battery)
 	return device_create_file(battery->bat.dev, &alarm_attr);
 }
 
+static void sysfs_update_battery(struct acpi_battery *battery)
+{
+	power_supply_changed(&battery->bat);
+}
+
 static void sysfs_remove_battery(struct acpi_battery *battery)
 {
 	if (!battery->bat.dev)
@@ -500,7 +505,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_update(struct acpi_battery *battery)
 		return result;
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER
 	if (!acpi_battery_present(battery)) {
-		sysfs_remove_battery(battery);
+		sysfs_update_battery(battery);
 		battery->update_time = 0;
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -513,8 +518,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_update(struct acpi_battery *battery)
 		acpi_battery_init_alarm(battery);
 	}
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER
-	if (!battery->bat.dev)
-		sysfs_add_battery(battery);
+	sysfs_update_battery(battery);
 #endif
 	return acpi_battery_get_state(battery);
 }



             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-10 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-10 17:57 Alan Jenkins [this message]
2009-05-11  0:31 ` [RFC] ACPI battery driver: odd usage of generic power supply class on battery removal Maxim Levitsky
2009-05-11 15:44 ` Alan Jenkins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A07159A.9010006@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --to=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox