public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: hal@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
	linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] laptop_panel.brightness_in_hardware: add all Asus laptops
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:22:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5FA837.9050300@tuffmail.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090708104300.GA10269@srcf.ucam.org>

Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The problem in that case is that the kernel changes the backlight for 
> us. The lack of consistency on this front makes life somewhat harder. 
>
> In terms of the "Some hardware sends keyboard events but also changes 
> the brightness", I'm working on a cleaner solution for this. The easiest 
> would seem to be to generate a uevent when the backlight is changed, 
> which would then allow userspace to pop up UI even though the key press 
> events aren't propagated. It would seem to deal with the Eee (and older 
> Thinkpad) cases quite nicely, but does require some more code in 
> userspace.
>   

Ok. Maybe it's trivial or "niche", but I really appreciate this. I think 
it's the only remaining issue I have with my EeePC :-).

I just saw the patch to generate uevents for the acpi video driver. It 
looks like it still generates KEY_BRIGHTNESSDOWN. Are you planning a 
followup patch, to suppress the input events when 
brightness_switch_enabled == 1?

Equally, w.r.t patch 3, I don't think eeepc-laptop, should generate 
brightness events on the *input* device anymore.

The rationale is that KEY_BRIGHTNESSDOWN is a user request to increase 
brightness. In these cases, the firmware/driver has already increased 
the brightness. We've notified userspace via the backlight device. So we 
shouldn't pass the request on to userspace; it has already been acted 
upon. If we still generate KEY_BRIGHTNESS*, userspace has to guess 
whether or not the change has already been applied. If there is too much 
latency, it guesses wrong :-(.

Thanks!
Alan

       reply	other threads:[~2009-07-16 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4A49D305.1040703@tuffmail.co.uk>
     [not found] ` <71cd59b00906300231yf2d3657tb5c5945f5aae0e7b@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <20090708095111.GA8471@srcf.ucam.org>
     [not found]     ` <61b223ba0907080336i313232cco216c9c647a2e9247@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <20090708104300.GA10269@srcf.ucam.org>
2009-07-16 22:22         ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2009-07-16 22:27           ` [PATCH] laptop_panel.brightness_in_hardware: add all Asus laptops Matthew Garrett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A5FA837.9050300@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --to=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
    --cc=hal@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox