From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Corey Minyard Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] IPMI devices from ACPI namespace Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:36:27 -0600 Message-ID: <4B224ADB.70305@acm.org> References: <20091118000427.14214.14043.stgit@bob.kio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.5]:59616 "EHLO vms173005pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754876AbZLKNgV (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:36:21 -0500 Received: from wf-rch.minyard.local ([173.57.145.237]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KUH00B0NPSS0UDF@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:36:28 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Zhao Yakui , Bela Lubkin , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Myron Stowe , openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Len Brown wrote: > Corey, Bjorn, > > To keep things simple, I've put the 5 patches in this series > together in the acpi-test tree. Let me know if that is > a bad idea. > > thanks, > Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center > > That sounds good to me. I have no way to test them. -corey