From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:04:28 +1100 Message-ID: <4B2FD4CC.5070609@crca.org.au> References: <200912210140.19713.rjw@sisk.pl> <4B2F22EF.6040500@crca.org.au> <1261425499.4328.10.camel@maxim-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.crca.org.au ([67.207.131.56]:40954 "EHLO crca.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753030AbZLUUEb (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:04:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1261425499.4328.10.camel@maxim-laptop> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , pm list , ACPI Devel Maling List , Dmitry Torokhov , Linus Torvalds , LKML Hi. Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 18:25 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> I'm not sure what the next step should be at this point. To me, the picture is >>> quite clear now, but perhaps we ought to run more tests on some other machines >>> or something. Please let me know what you think. >> Looks great. If you do decide you want other machines tested, I'll >> happily try the machines around here: >> >> - Dell M1530 >> - Omnibook XE3-GF. >> - Via LN10000 based Mythtv Box >> - Desktop machine - Some Intel-based mobo I've forgotten the name of. >> >> I've been quietly following the thread, but have lost track of what >> iteration of the patch you're on, so if you'd give me a pointer to it, >> I'd be grateful. >> >> By the way, I haven't forgotten about sending some real patches for >> swsusp (ie more than just cleanups). I'm just busy with other things and >> also thinking carefully about what order to do things in. > > I vote for ability to save all ram to the disk. > After several days of testing I managed to make my system do s2disk > really reliable (~300 cycles tested), but suspending when memory is > tight still fails sometimes. > > I didn't yet use your tuxonice system though. Well, I want to and intend on working towards merging as much of TuxOnIce as people will allow in, but it will take a long time because there are so many modifications to do, I don't have that much time to work on it, am splitting the time I do have and am still have a couple of new features I want to do to TuxOnIce. Regards, Nigel