From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI and driver patches for 2.6.33.merge Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:41:45 -0800 Message-ID: <4B312F09.5020602@kernel.org> References: <86802c440912171728s27dd7108k85a0f1563660c95b@mail.gmail.com> <4B3035B0.9030303@kernel.org> <4B307C4D.501@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:59818 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752376AbZLVUnV (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:43:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Shaohua Li , Ingo Molnar , "Barnes, Jesse" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Len Brown wrote: > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> Len Brown wrote: >>> Does 3563ff964fdc36358cef0330936fdac28e65142a work or fail on your system? >>> I didn't ask about reverting it, I asked if it works or fails. >> i don't know. >> >> anything i should search in the bootlog? > > Please check out a branch at the commit identified above > and tell us if the following issue: > > "it seems these three patches broke the _OSC on my intel new systems." > > "revert them fix the problem with AER and pciehp and etc" > > is present or absent on that branch. > > If the answer is yes, when stock 2.6.32 works, then the 3 patches > between that commit and 2.6.32 are at fault. If the answer is no, > yet reverting those patches helps top of tree, then the issue must > be a merge conflict with other changes in 2.6.33. 8aedf8a6ae98d5d4df3254b6afb7e4432d9d8600 the one just before acpi release was merged to mainline it works. YH