From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add DMI quirk for Intel DP55KG mainboard Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:37:33 -0800 Message-ID: <4B42B3FD.7000608@zytor.com> References: <20100104162114.GA30113@percival.namespace.at> <4B4225B3.8070705@zytor.com> <4B42A0CC.2090907@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53418 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753900Ab0AEDlz (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:41:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B42A0CC.2090907@gmail.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Robert Hancock Cc: Len Brown , Christian Hofstaedtler , x86@kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel Mailing List , bruce.w.allan@intel.com, Thomas Gleixner , Justin Piszcz , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Venkatesh Pallipadi , Andrey Borzenkov On 01/04/2010 06:15 PM, Robert Hancock wrote: > > Think you mean 2001, Vista was 2006.. > > I'm assuming that Windows is using ACPI reset these days, so presumably > that's what we should be doing by default, and blacklisting machines > where that doesn't work, rather than the reverse.. Using a DMI cutoff year in the mid-2000's seems like it would make sense. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.