From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jin Dongming Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] ACPI: Use GPE reference counting to support shared GPEs Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:05:07 +0900 Message-ID: <4B7CE6A3.7020103@np.css.fujitsu.com> References: <201002172335.47703.rjw@sisk.pl> <201002172341.07353.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:36746 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752434Ab0BRHDr (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:03:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201002172341.07353.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jesse Barnes , "Moore, Robert" , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list , Linux PCI , Shaohua Li , Bjorn Helgaas , Oliver Neukum , Matthew Garrett , LKML , Gary Hade Hi, Rafael J. Wysocki > - /* Update enable mask, but don't enable the HW GPE as of yet */ > - > - status = acpi_ev_enable_gpe(gpe_event_info, FALSE); I think the above line code should be remained. If it is deleted, the exception event will be raised on some machine. Best Regards, Jin Dongming > - > ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_LOAD, > "Registered GPE method %s as GPE number 0x%.2X\n", > name, gpe_number)); > - return_ACPI_STATUS(status); > + return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK); > } >