From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
chen gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH]: ACPI: Automatically online hot-added memory
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:23:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA3B315.6080905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201003191755.35421.trenn@suse.de>
>
> Blocking does not work.
> But I have an idea, whatabout:
> - CPU add rule which only adds a CPU if the corresponding Numa node already
> has onlined memory
> - Memory add rule which adds the memory and also onlines CPUs if the Numa
> node still has offlined CPUs
>
> This has the side effect that you online a CPU which may have been offlined on
> purpose if you hotadd memory on the same node..., a rather uncommon case.
>
>
That actually might be more of a problem than you think. It's not
atypical that in the evening a system's components are offlined in order
to save power. Maintenance also is scheduled for downtime so when
memory is added to the system we may bring cpus into service
erroneously. I think the "end-user" may not be too happy with this result.
[OTOH, a little documentation could fix that issue]
> A quick try showed that it would be convenient to add the Numa node to the
> uevent which is a bit tricky...
> Ok, I got this working, but messed up the cpu hotplugging with my patches:
> ...
> Unable to map lapic 32 to logical cpu number
> ...
> This already worked...
>
> I wanted to post something today, but I couldn't made it.
> Still I more or less could prove that above works and I hopefully can show
> some results on Monday.
>
>
If it works then I'm all for it :)
> Comments?
>
> Thomas
>
> BTW: I was wrong with slub. It also has bad side effects. What is strange is
>
FWIW, I'm testing with slab.
P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-09 14:12 [RFC PATCH]: ACPI: Automatically online hot-added memory Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-09 15:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-03-09 18:27 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-10 1:57 ` ykzhao
2010-03-10 13:28 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-11 0:55 ` ykzhao
2010-03-11 2:18 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-11 8:07 ` ykzhao
2010-03-11 8:32 ` chen gong
2010-03-11 11:25 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-12 13:18 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-17 18:47 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-19 16:55 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-19 17:23 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2010-03-20 20:51 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-24 14:40 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-24 15:16 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-11 11:18 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-12 1:31 ` ykzhao
2010-03-12 13:01 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-17 15:24 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-09 19:10 ` Alex Chiang
2010-03-09 19:15 ` Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA3B315.6080905@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).