From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: pci_irq, add PRT_ quirk for IBM Bartolo
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:12:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C290245.2040001@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100628171410.GA27367@srcf.ucam.org>
On 06/28/2010 07:14 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:13:24AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 06/28/2010 02:14 AM, Robert Hancock wrote:
>>> That seems a rather serious DSDT flaw. Do devices in that slot work in
>>> Windows?
>>
>> Yes, the DSDT is pretty broken this way there. Regarding Windows, I
>> don't know and I doubt anybody will ever try.
>
> http://www-07.ibm.com/hk/products/pos/300/specs.html indicates that
> Windows is supported on this hardware. It would be good to verify that
> it also fails before we try a model-specific quirk.
It would be good for what? I don't see the point, DSDT is broken on that
machine and the patch works this around. Why do we need testruns from
Windows? And why you think Windows will fail anyway, they can very have
the pretty same quirk there.
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-28 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-27 21:21 [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: pci_irq, add PRT_ quirk for IBM Bartolo Jiri Slaby
2010-06-28 0:14 ` Robert Hancock
2010-06-28 6:13 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-06-28 17:14 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-06-28 20:12 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2010-06-28 20:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-06-28 21:37 ` Robert Hancock
2010-06-29 18:40 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-06-29 23:23 ` Robert Hancock
2010-06-30 9:20 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-06-30 9:40 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-07-06 0:28 ` Robert Hancock
2010-07-19 16:29 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-07-19 19:19 ` Robert Hancock
2010-07-20 9:29 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-08-24 8:11 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-08-24 23:25 ` Robert Hancock
2010-08-30 7:36 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-09-07 11:02 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-09-07 14:40 ` Robert Hancock
2010-09-08 15:05 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-04-12 8:48 ` [RFC " Jiri Slaby
2011-04-12 8:58 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-04-12 15:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-04-12 15:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-04-14 9:40 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-05-13 7:18 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C290245.2040001@suse.cz \
--to=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).