From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ACPI/PCI: ask bios for control of all native services at once
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:42:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C529086.9090600@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C526FDC.6050800@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi,
I have a concern.
(2010/07/30 15:23), Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
(snip)
> +/**
> + * pcie_port_acpi_setup - Request the BIOS to release control of PCIe services.
> + * @port: PCIe Port service for a root port or event collector.
> + * @srv_mask: Bit mask of services that can be enabled for @port.
> + *
> + * Invoked when @port is identified as a PCIe port device. To avoid conflicts
> + * with the BIOS PCIe port native services support requires the BIOS to yield
> + * control of these services to the kernel. The mask of services that the BIOS
> + * allows to be enabled for @port is written to @srv_mask.
> + *
> + * NOTE: It turns out that we cannot do that for individual port services
> + * separately, because that would make some systems work incorrectly.
> + */
> +int pcie_port_acpi_setup(struct pci_dev *port, int *srv_mask)
> +{
> + acpi_status status;
> + acpi_handle handle;
> + u32 flags, request;
> +
> + if (acpi_pci_disabled)
> + return 0;
> +
> + handle = acpi_find_root_bridge_handle(port);
> + if (!handle)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + request = (OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL |
> + OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL |
> + OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL |
> + OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL);
> +
> + if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(port)) {
> + dev_dbg(&port->dev, "PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n");
> + request &= ~OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
> + }
We should drop OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL from request when AER is not
configured, and also when AER is disabled for some reason (e.g. pci=noaer).
Otherwise no one own AER errors, it will mean that unhandled error might
cause unexpected system behavior.
> +
> + status = acpi_pci_osc_control_query(handle, request, &flags);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + dev_dbg(&port->dev, "ACPI _OSC query failed (code %d)\n",
> + status);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(flags & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL)) {
> + dev_dbg(&port->dev, "BIOS refuses to grant control of PCIe "
> + "Capability Structure\n");
> + return -EACCES;
> + }
> +
> + request &= flags;
> + *srv_mask = PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_VC;
> + if (request & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL)
> + *srv_mask |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
> + if (request & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL)
> + *srv_mask |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME;
> + if (request & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL)
> + *srv_mask |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER;
> +
> + status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, request);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + dev_dbg(&port->dev, "ACPI _OSC request failed (code %d)\n",
> + status);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(&port->dev, "ACPI _OSC control granted for 0x%02x\n", request);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
I'll post a fix for this soon.
Thanks,
H.Seto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-30 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-28 21:23 [PATCH] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-28 21:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-29 5:03 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-29 15:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:00 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 6:16 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 6:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] ACPI/PCI: cleanup acpi_pci_run_osc Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 12:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] ACPI/PCI: do not preserve query result Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 12:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] ACPI/PCI: optimize checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 12:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI/PCI: ask bios for control of all native services at once Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 8:42 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2010-07-30 8:47 ` [PATCH] portdrv: Don't take control of AER if not required Hidetoshi Seto
2010-07-30 12:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI/PCI: ask bios for control of all native services at once Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI: portdrv: disable native hot-plug interrupt Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 6:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] PCI: portdrv: remove module_exit Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 11:50 ` [PATCH] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C529086.9090600@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).