From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 7/8] ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v2)
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:38:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5A324F.8060206@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008041415.23248.rjw@sisk.pl>
(2010/08/04 21:15), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 04, 2010, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>> (2010/08/04 17:43), Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>>> /**
>>> * acpi_pci_osc_control_set - commit requested control to Firmware
>>> * @handle: acpi_handle for the target ACPI object
>>> @@ -411,14 +379,17 @@ acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_query(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask)
>>> *
>>> * Attempt to take control from Firmware on requested control bits.
>>> **/
>>
>> Updating description of this function would be appreciated.
OK, I will do it.
>>> @@ -452,7 +427,10 @@ acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 flags)
>>> capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_TYPE] = root->osc_control_set | control_req;
>>> status = acpi_pci_run_osc(handle, capbuf,&result);
>>> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
>>> - root->osc_control_set = result;
>>> + root->osc_control_set = *flags = result;
>>
>> I don't think we need to update *flags here, though it depends on the design
>> of this function interface.
>> IMHO, updating *flags only when AE_SUPPORT is returned is easy to understand.
>
> I think the patch is correct. We should update *flags in any case so that the
> caller can check what's the full mask of granted controls even if it asked for
> fewer control bits.
My idea (that will be what I'll add to the description of function) is:
On success, OS takes all of requested control(s) and *flags is updated with
set of controls now OS have.
If AE_SUPPORT returns, none of control settings are changed since Firmware
rejects granting some of requested controls. *flags is updated with set of
controls with rejected bits cleared.
All other cases mean failure, none of control settings are changed, and
*flags is unchanged.
Thanks,
H.Seto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-02 21:51 [PATCH 0/8] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] ACPI / PCI: Introduce acpi_pci_osc_control_query() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 4:52 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 9:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 5:04 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 9:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 20:58 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 4:28 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 23:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-05 23:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:54 ` [PATCH 2/8] PCI / PCIe/ AER: Introduce pci_aer_available() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 0:46 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-03 9:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 20:59 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 9:41 ` Jike Song
2010-08-03 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:55 ` [PATCH 3/8] PCI / PCIe: Introduce commad line switch for disabling port services Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v6) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 1:14 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-03 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06 1:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-06 10:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] PCI / PCIe: Disable PCIe port services during port initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] PCI / PCIe: Remove the port driver module exit routine Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:59 ` [PATCH 7/8] ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 4:52 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 7:13 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-03 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 21:02 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 5:46 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 8:41 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-04 9:23 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 10:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 23:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-05 3:40 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-05 14:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06 1:28 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-04 8:43 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-04 9:39 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 12:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-05 3:38 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2010-08-04 10:38 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 22:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / PCI: Reorder checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 4:51 ` [PATCH 0/8] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v2) Kenji Kaneshige
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C5A324F.8060206@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).