From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: pci_irq, add PRT_ quirk for IBM Bartolo Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:02:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4C861BB9.2000707@gmail.com> References: <1277673679-21458-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <4C27E965.80508@gmail.com> <4C283D84.6080504@suse.cz> <20100628171410.GA27367@srcf.ucam.org> <4C290245.2040001@suse.cz> <20100628204820.GA32503@srcf.ucam.org> <4C2A3E27.4060407@suse.cz> <4C2B0C73.9050200@suse.cz> <4C3278C8.60503@gmail.com> <4C447D6D.5060801@suse.cz> <4C456C69.60606@suse.cz> <4C737E9F.7060107@gmail.com> <4C7B5F64.30205@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C7B5F64.30205@suse.cz> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Cc: Robert Hancock , Matthew Garrett , lenb@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 08/30/2010 09:36 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 08/25/2010 01:25 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> So, to sum up: >>> 1) acpi routing enabled (no kernel parameter) => ports 4+5 defunct. >>> ports 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 11 >>> >>> 2) acpi routing disabled (acpi=noirq) => all ports working, 4+5 on irq >>> 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >>> >>> 3) with the quirk [1] and acpi routing enabled => all ports working, >>> ports 4+5 on irq 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >>> >>> 4) in windows => 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 9 and the ports are all working. >>> >>> Any ideas what this means? Especially point 4)? >>> >>> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/27/85 >> >> I think that's the key question. Is Windows actually using ACPI on >> that machine at all? (Check the computer type in Device Manager and >> see if it mentions ACPI.) > > Yes, there is Computer->ACPI PC. Any ideas here, please? Is there anything what I might try? thanks, -- js