From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Corey Minyard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3_v14] IPMI/ACPI: Install the ACPI IPMI opregion Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:11:15 -0600 Message-ID: <4D077B03.5020102@acm.org> References: <1291774218-6834-1-git-send-email-yakui.zhao@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9]:50920 "EHLO vms173009pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751014Ab0LNOL1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:11:27 -0500 Received: from wf-rch.minyard.local ([unknown] [173.57.145.237]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LDF001HC8QTFOF0@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:11:22 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Zhao Yakui , openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 12/13/2010 11:21 PM, Len Brown wrote: > Corey, > Most of the code is in drivers/acpi, but that depends on the ipmi part. > Shall I take all three patches in the acpi-test tree? > > thanks, > Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center > I was trying to figure out what to do with these, so yes, I think that pulling them into the acpi-test tree is good. They won't get tested any other way, I don't think. Thanks, -corey