From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matthieu castet Subject: Re: [RFC] merge 32/64 bits realmode wakeup code Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:43:44 +0100 Message-ID: <4D447C00.70709@free.fr> References: <4D41EA12.1030402@free.fr> <201101272354.00042.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.6]:42355 "EHLO smtp6-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750968Ab1A2Unz (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:43:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201101272354.00042.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel list , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org Rafael J. Wysocki a =E9crit : > On Thursday, January 27, 2011, matthieu castet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this patch merge 32 and 64 realmode wakeup code : >> - this mean less ifdef in code >> - we could remove now unused field in wakeup_header (pmode_*) >> - this allow to set the first 1 MB NX. >> >> Do you think it is safe on all X86 32 bit machine ? >> >> Matthieu >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET >=20 > It _looks_ sane, but it will require some serious testing. I'm not s= ure, > though, if we can get enough testing coverage without actually commit= ting > that change. >=20 > How much testing has it received so far? >=20 Not too much only qemu with 1 and 2 core and a laptop with 1 cpu. Please note that with this patch we can also remove the gdt, idt, ldt s= tuff from=20 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S Matthieu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html