From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] ACPI: pci_irq, add PRT_ quirk for IBM Bartolo Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:40:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4DA6C129.8010001@suse.cz> References: <4C87A62E.30108@gmail.com> <1302598086-3622-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <20110412085622.43488ed9@jbarnes-desktop> <20110412155921.GA531@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:33734 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757284Ab1DNJlF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:41:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110412155921.GA531@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Jesse Barnes , jirislaby@gmail.com, Robert Hancock , lenb@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/12/2011 05:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 08:56:22AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> I'll defer to the ACPI experts, Len or Matthew have you checked this >> one out? > > Windows appears to work without this, so it seems likely that we're > doing something wrong in some other sense, but I don't think we have a > good idea as to what we're doing wrong... Is there anything I can do about that? Provide some info, investigate what a particular code does in the kernel (e.g. acpi_pci_irq_enable) etc.? thanks, -- js suse labs