From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hidetoshi Seto Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] HWPoison: add memory_failure_queue() Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:33:39 +0900 Message-ID: <4DDDADF3.30507@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1305619719-7480-1-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com> <1305619719-7480-6-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com> <20110517084622.GE22093@elte.hu> <4DD23750.3030606@intel.com> <20110517092620.GI22093@elte.hu> <4DD31C78.6000209@intel.com> <20110520115614.GH14745@elte.hu> <20110522100021.GA28177@elte.hu> <4DDCB294.9000405@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110525141115.GE19118@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110525141115.GE19118@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: huang ying , Huang Ying , Len Brown , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andi Kleen , "Luck, Tony" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Andi Kleen , "Wu, Fengguang" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (2011/05/25 23:11), Ingo Molnar wrote: > No, i think your patch is already a pretty nice simplification of the > MCE code - using irq_work is obviously better than the open-coded MCE > vector approach! > > These are exactly the kind of small steps towards generalizations > that i wanted to see: each step without being intrusive and breaking > stuff and working towards improving the status quo. Thank you, Ingo! I have some minor patches for mce codes too so I'll post this and those in new thread soon. Thanks, H.Seto