From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI _OSC support
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:21:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0151A0.90505@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110621132256.GB4902@srcf.ucam.org>
On 06/21/2011 09:22 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:16:27PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>
>> + rc = apei_osc_setup();
>> + if (rc)
>> + pr_info(GHES_PFX "Evaluate APEI _OSC failed!\n");
>
> Hm. This is maybe a little strong. It'd be valid for a machine to return
> an error here but still have the GHES functionality enabled via the
> generic call, but this message would still show up and potentially
> confuse the user. Can we keep a flag to check whether the generic method
> gave us control, and only give the error if both fail to enable it?
At least on some of my testing machine, generic _OSC call will not
return any error even it does not support APEI bit. So I think
sometimes it may be helpful to printk something here. To avoid
confusion, can we change the message as follow.
- generic _OSC succeeded, APEI _OSC failed: APEI firmware first mode is
enabled by APEI bit.
- generic _OSC failed, APEI _OSC succeeded: APEI firmware first mode is
enabled by APEI _OSC.
- both succeeded: APEI firmware first mode is enabled by APEI bit and
APEI _OSC.
- both failed: Failed to enable APEI firmware first mode!
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 7:16 [PATCH 0/4] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI related _OSC support Huang Ying
2011-06-21 7:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI, APEI, GHES, Prevent GHES to be built as module Huang Ying
2011-06-21 7:23 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-21 7:30 ` Huang Ying
2011-06-21 13:18 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-21 13:23 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-21 7:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI, APEI, GHES, Support disable GHES at boot time Huang Ying
2011-06-21 7:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI bit support in generic _OSC call Huang Ying
2011-06-21 7:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI _OSC support Huang Ying
2011-06-21 13:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-22 2:21 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2011-06-22 15:49 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0151A0.90505@intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).