From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen Gong Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: Call ACPI remove handler when handling ACPI eject event Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:37:41 +0800 Message-ID: <4EA0CCE5.3060207@linux.intel.com> References: <1318992470-10195-1-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1318992470-10195-2-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20111020093730.GA18393@oc8440477808.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:14860 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752049Ab1JUBhq (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:37:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111020093730.GA18393@oc8440477808.ibm.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: qemulist@gmail.com Cc: Gong Chen , pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, shaohua.li@intel.com, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lenb@kernel.org =E4=BA=8E 2011/10/20 17:37, qemulist@gmail.com =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 09:35:46PM +0800, Gong Chen wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:47 AM, wrot= e: >>> From: Liu Ping Fan >>> >>> Call the remove handler for ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan >>> --- >>> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 2 +- >>> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 +- >>> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 ++ >>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c >>> index 437ddbf..d06ec6d 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c >>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c >>> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_notify(acpi_handle handle,= u32 type, void *data) >>> break; >>> >>> case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST: >>> - /* TBD */ >>> + acpi_os_hotplug_execute(acpi_bus_hot_remove_device,= handle); >>> break; >>> >>> case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK_LIGHT: >>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c >>> index 449c556..3b97b61 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c >>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c >>> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ acpi_device_modalias_show(struct device *dev, str= uct device_attribute *attr, cha >>> } >>> static DEVICE_ATTR(modalias, 0444, acpi_device_modalias_show, NUL= L); >>> >>> -static void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *context) >>> +void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *context) >>> { >>> struct acpi_device *device; >>> acpi_handle handle =3D context; >>> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h >>> index 6cd5b64..b19c09d 100644 >>> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h >>> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h >>> @@ -310,6 +310,8 @@ extern int unregister_acpi_notifier(struct noti= fier_block *); >>> >>> extern int register_acpi_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); >>> extern void unregister_acpi_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *n= b); >>> +extern void acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(void *context); >>> + >>> /* >>> * External Functions >>> */ >>> -- >>> 1.7.4.4 >>> >> >> I preferred the patch from Shen before. Here is the link: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/24/15 >> As Bjorn said, "long-term goal to move the hotplug flow out of drive= rs and into >> the ACPI core". An arbitrary change in the global level just mess up= the codes. > Got it, thanks. And so will this feature emerge in upstream soon? > > Thanks and regards, > pingfan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne= l" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > It's up to the maintainer, should be Len Brown :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html