From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] intel_idle: Split up and provide per CPU initialization
 func
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:06:19 -0500
Message-ID: <4F15562B.1080406@kernel.org>
References: <1321569421-46220-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <1321569421-46220-4-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:42425 "EHLO
	mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753306Ab2AQLGW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:06:22 -0500
Received: by qadc10 with SMTP id c10so700176qad.19
        for <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:06:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1321569421-46220-4-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On 11/17/2011 05:36 PM, Thomas Renninger wrote:

> Function split up, should have no functional change


benefit?