From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] acpi/libata: Express dependencies for devices on dock stations and bays Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:42:37 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1669DD.8030107@garzik.org> References: <20111206163718.GA3629@homac.suse.de> <20120105103651.GB13066@homac.suse.de> <4F165B59.8050609@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:50223 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752059Ab2ARGmk (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:42:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F165B59.8050609@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Holger Macht , Jeff Garzik , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Shaohua Li , Tejun Heo On 01/18/2012 12:40 AM, Len Brown wrote: > Nice to see this effort. I hadn't noticed it before. > This is mostly an ATA patch, and so I would hope to see > Tejun review it and Jeff Garzik ship it in his ata tree. > > I don't see any problem w/ the ACPI bits. That sounds like an ACK from ACPI to me... Will queue and push via libata-dev, assuming there are no cross-tree conflicts/dependencies with acpi in linux-next. Jeff