From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per package v2 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:00:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4F75A070.9020008@kernel.org> References: <1328545032-21373-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1328545032-21373-5-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <4F758569.9080608@kernel.org> <20120330114633.GA16502@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:53138 "EHLO mail-qc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934174Ab2C3MAv (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:00:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120330114633.GA16502@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen On 03/30/2012 07:46 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:05:29AM -0400, Len Brown wrote: >> Andi, >> Can you re-base this on top of my release tree? >> >> Your fix is important, but conflicted with mjg's >> more invasive percentage -> frequency change. > > Sorry, I think it's probably better not to take my patch here - the spec > uses percentages rather than frequencies. I'm not convinced that that > makes sense, but there's some chance that some behaviour may end up > depending on that. > Ok Matthew, I've dropped your patch and pulled in Andi's. thanks, -Len