linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Lists Linaro-dev <linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rob Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>
Subject: cpuidle future and improvements
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:40:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDEE98D.7010802@linaro.org> (raw)


Dear all,

A few weeks ago, Peter De Schrijver proposed a patch [1] to allow per
cpu latencies. We had a discussion about this patchset because it
reverse the modifications Deepthi did some months ago [2] and we may
want to provide a different implementation.

The Linaro Connect [3] event bring us the opportunity to meet people
involved in the power management and the cpuidle area for different SoC.

With the Tegra3 and big.LITTLE architecture, making per cpu latencies
for cpuidle is vital.

Also, the SoC vendors would like to have the ability to tune their cpu
latencies through the device tree.

We agreed in the following steps:

1. factor out / cleanup the cpuidle code as much as possible
2. better sharing of code amongst SoC idle drivers by moving common bits
to core code
3. make the cpuidle_state structure contain only data
4. add a API to register latencies per cpu

These four steps impacts all the architecture. I began the factor out
code / cleanup [4] and that has been accepted upstream and I proposed
some modifications [5] but I had a very few answers.

The patch review are very slow and done at the last minute at the merge
window and that makes code upstreaming very difficult. It is not a
reproach, it is just how it is and I would like to propose a solution
for that.

I propose to host a cpuidle-next tree where all these modifications will
be and where people can send patches against, preventing last minutes
conflicts and perhaps Lenb will agree to pull from this tree. In the
meantime, the tree will be part of the linux-next, the patches will be
more widely tested and could be fixed earlier.

Thanks
-- Daniel

[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/491257/
[2] http://lwn.net/Articles/464808/
[3] http://summit.linaro.org/
[4]
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg67033.html,
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pm/msg27330.html,
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/76311,
http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/18885/11795/

[5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/8/375

-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

             reply	other threads:[~2012-06-18  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-18  8:40 Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-06-18 11:54 ` cpuidle future and improvements Deepthi Dharwar
2012-06-18 12:35   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-18 12:53     ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-06-18 12:55       ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-18 13:06         ` Jean Pihet
2012-06-18 13:26           ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-18 13:30 ` [linux-pm] " a0393909
2012-06-25 12:58   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-06-25 13:10     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-25 13:17       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-06-25 13:27   ` linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-25 22:53     ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-02  9:09     ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-02 12:51       ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-02 19:49         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-02 22:14           ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-03  8:59             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-03 12:56               ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-03 13:19                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-03 13:25                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-03 16:54                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-05 13:33                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-03 19:20             ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-03 19:33               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-02 20:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-18 18:15 ` cpuidle future and improvements Colin Cross
2012-06-18 19:00   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-25 12:54   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-11 14:00     ` [linux-pm] " Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FDEE98D.7010802@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rob.lee@linaro.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).