From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:36:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF0A6C5.5080509@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201206300027.05175.rjw@sisk.pl>
On 06/30/2012 12:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, June 29, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 06/28/2012 09:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
>>>> driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
>>>> acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately
>>>> this code introduce a dependency between intel_idle and acpi.
>>>>
>>>> This patch is intended to remove this dependency by using the
>>>> notifier of intel_idle. This patch has the benefit of
>>>> encapsulating the intel_idle driver and remove some exported
>>>> functions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> This one looks good to me too.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>>
>> Thanks for the review Rafael.
>>
>>> Len, are you going to take it?
>>
>> Rafael, Len,
>>
>> After the discussion [1], I put in place a tree at:
>>
>> ssh://git.linaro.org/srv/git.linaro.org/git/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git
>> #cpuidle-next
>>
>> I proposed this tree to group the cpuidle modifications and prevent the
>> last minutes conflict when Len will apply them.
>>
>> I also included the tree into linux-next for wider testing.
>
> I can't speak for Len, but I'm not sure he'll like this.
I sent the proposition a week ago and Len was Cc'ed. I guess he is very
busy but the problem we are facing is there are a lot of pending
modifications for cpuidle because of some new architecture (like the
big.LITTLE and tegra3). Colin's patchset is one of them.
> Anyway, you seem to have the same material as Len in that tree, won't there
> be any conflicts in linux-next?
At the first glance no, until he merge the patches we sent. As I already
said the purpose is to help to consolidate the patches sent for cpuidle
by acting as a proxy.
I hope that helps.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-01 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-15 15:28 acpi_idle and max_cpus Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-17 20:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-18 12:25 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-06-18 12:54 ` [linux-pm] " Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-19 6:54 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-06-19 7:03 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-19 7:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-19 15:30 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-25 11:25 ` [PATCH] acpi, cpuidle: Register with cpuidle even if cpu is onlined after boot (beyond maxcpus) Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-25 13:53 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-25 16:03 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-26 9:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-26 9:41 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-26 9:58 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-26 10:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-26 11:01 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-27 9:07 ` [PATCH] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-27 13:06 ` Thomas Renninger
[not found] ` <201206271506.29034.trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-28 8:03 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-28 8:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-28 11:24 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-28 11:27 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-28 11:56 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-28 19:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-29 8:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-29 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-01 19:36 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-06-27 16:16 ` [PATCH] " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-28 7:34 ` [linux-pm] " Thomas Renninger
2012-06-28 11:23 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-26 11:07 ` [PATCH] acpi, cpuidle: Register with cpuidle even if cpu is onlined after boot (beyond maxcpus) Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF0A6C5.5080509@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).