From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:25:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF2F2D3.4090200@linaro.org> References: <4FDEE98D.7010802@linaro.org> <201207022149.36629.rjw@sisk.pl> <4FF21D48.50301@linaro.org> <201207031059.13758.rjw@sisk.pl> <4FF2EC1A.7020702@linaro.org> <20120703231948.33cca18e3cc3d6e497ab022d@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120703231948.33cca18e3cc3d6e497ab022d@canb.auug.org.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Kevin Hilman , Rob Lee , Lists Linaro-dev , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Amit Kucheria , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Colin Cross , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , Peter De Schrijver List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 07/03/2012 03:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Daniel, >=20 > On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:56:58 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> >>> So do you have a branch in the cpuidle-next.git tree that isn't going= to >>> be rebased? >> >> No. I am following Linus tree and adding the patches on top of it. >=20 > Please don't rebase your tree more than necessary - it just makes thing > hard for anyone using your tree as a base for further development and > throws away any testing you may have done. Ok, let me sync with Len and Rafael about the best way to do that. Thanks -- Daniel --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for A= RM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog