From: Rajendra Nayak <rajendra.nayak@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:59:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFBE7E3.8020809@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF6C4C1.7030004@linaro.org>
Hi Daniel,
On Friday 06 July 2012 04:28 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The main purpose of all these cleanup patches are to move out all
> non-data information from the cpuidle_state structure in order to add a
> new api which could be 'cpuidle_register_cpu_latency(int cpu, struct
> cpuidle_latencies latencies)'.
So are there any technical difficulties in adding such an api with the
non-data information being part of cpuidle_state? Or its just that you
think the already duplicated non-data information (per state) is going
to be duplicated much more (per state per cpu) in most cases.
regards,
Rajendra
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-05 13:23 [PATCH 1/4] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 10:58 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-10 8:29 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-07-10 11:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-10 12:38 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuidle: move enter_dead to " Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 11:05 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuidle : move tlb flag to the cpuidle header Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 11:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-05 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFBE7E3.8020809@linaro.org \
--to=rajendra.nayak@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).