From: Rajendra Nayak <rajendra.nayak@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:08:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFC2256.5050305@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFC147C.4050508@linaro.org>
> As the architectures tend to add more cores [1][2], that means more
> memory consumption. In a very near future, we will have 100 cores in a
> cpu. Assuming we have 4 C-states, that is 100 * 4 * 8 = 3200 bytes of
> memory used for a single function. IMHO, the kernel shouldn't assume the
> user must add more memory on the system.
I completely agree.
>
> Anyway, I will post a patchset to use the cpuidle_state per cpu.
Maybe what you were doing wasn't clearly evident with the existing
cpuidle core, but once its scaled to add a per cpu state, it might
look more meaningful. So if you post your patches to add cpuidle
state per cpu, it should certainly give more insight into why this
cleanup makes sense.
>
> Thanks
> -- Daniel
>
> [1] http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/11/intel-demonstrates-80-core-processor/
> [2] http://www.tilera.com/products/processors/TILE-Gx_Family
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-05 13:23 [PATCH 1/4] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 10:58 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-10 8:29 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-10 11:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-10 12:38 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuidle: move enter_dead to " Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 11:05 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuidle : move tlb flag to the cpuidle header Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 11:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-05 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFC2256.5050305@linaro.org \
--to=rajendra.nayak@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).