From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] acpi : remove latency_ticks from acpi_processor_cx structure
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:47:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFF37F4.3060002@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201207122234.12851.rjw@sisk.pl>
On 07/12/2012 10:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Remove the latency_ticks field as it is not used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>
> Thanks for the patches, but can you please repost them to
> linux-pm@vger.kernel.org so that they are included into the kernel.org
> Patchwork? They will be much easier to review and handle then.
>
> And please CC linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org for all ACPI-related patches in the
> future.
Yes, sure. Sorry for that.
Thanks
-- Daniel
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 --
>> include/acpi/processor.h | 1 -
>> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> index b894627..9ef007d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> @@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_power_verify_c3(struct acpi_processor *pr,
>> */
>> cx->valid = 1;
>>
>> - cx->latency_ticks = cx->latency;
>> /*
>> * On older chipsets, BM_RLD needs to be set
>> * in order for Bus Master activity to wake the
>> @@ -616,7 +615,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_power_verify(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>> if (!cx->address)
>> break;
>> cx->valid = 1;
>> - cx->latency_ticks = cx->latency; /* Normalize latency */
>> break;
>>
>> case ACPI_STATE_C3:
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
>> index ac3bff6..19423c3 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
>> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ struct acpi_processor_cx {
>> u8 entry_method;
>> u8 index;
>> u32 latency;
>> - u32 latency_ticks;
>> u32 power;
>> u32 usage;
>> u64 time;
>>
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1342107003-9811-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
2012-07-12 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] acpi : remove latency_ticks from acpi_processor_cx structure Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-12 20:47 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-07-12 21:03 Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-12 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-17 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFF37F4.3060002@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).