From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] acpi : remove latency_ticks from acpi_processor_cx structure Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:47:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4FFF37F4.3060002@linaro.org> References: <1342107003-9811-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <201207122234.12851.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:44281 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756254Ab2GLUrx (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:47:53 -0400 Received: by eekb15 with SMTP id b15so766666eek.19 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:47:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201207122234.12851.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM list , ACPI Devel Mailing List On 07/12/2012 10:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> Remove the latency_ticks field as it is not used. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano >=20 > Thanks for the patches, but can you please repost them to > linux-pm@vger.kernel.org so that they are included into the kernel.or= g > Patchwork? They will be much easier to review and handle then. >=20 > And please CC linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org for all ACPI-related patches= in the > future. Yes, sure. Sorry for that. Thanks -- Daniel >> --- >> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 -- >> include/acpi/processor.h | 1 - >> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_= idle.c >> index b894627..9ef007d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c >> @@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_power_verify_c3(struc= t acpi_processor *pr, >> */ >> cx->valid =3D 1; >> =20 >> - cx->latency_ticks =3D cx->latency; >> /* >> * On older chipsets, BM_RLD needs to be set >> * in order for Bus Master activity to wake the >> @@ -616,7 +615,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_power_verify(struct ac= pi_processor *pr) >> if (!cx->address) >> break; >> cx->valid =3D 1;=20 >> - cx->latency_ticks =3D cx->latency; /* Normalize latency */ >> break; >> =20 >> case ACPI_STATE_C3: >> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h >> index ac3bff6..19423c3 100644 >> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h >> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h >> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ struct acpi_processor_cx { >> u8 entry_method; >> u8 index; >> u32 latency; >> - u32 latency_ticks; >> u32 power; >> u32 usage; >> u64 time; >> >=20 --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for= ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html