public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Scardovi <mscardovi95@gmail.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Francesco Lauritano <francesco.lauritano1@protonmail.com>,
	Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:GPIO ACPI SUPPORT" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
	<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	"westeri@kernel.org" <westeri@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 36-second boot delay due to by acpi_gpio_handle_deferred_request_irqs on ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:45:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e55e31e-a5e8-4098-8a7f-bb52476b882a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260422090709.GB557136@black.igk.intel.com>


On 4/22/26 11:07, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 09:51:01AM +0200, Marco Scardovi wrote:
>> On 12/18/25 11:38, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:33:14AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 18-Dec-25 07:39, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 07:19:56PM +0000, Francesco Lauritano wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 17th, 2025 at 7:01 PM, Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/17/25 10:57 AM, Francesco Lauritano wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 17th, 2025 at 4:12 PM, Francesco Lauritano francesco.lauritano1@protonmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The _AEI defines 5 GPIO interrupts. Narrowed it down to two:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> gpiolib_acpi.ignore_interrupt=AMDI0030:00@21,AMDI0030:00@24
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This fixes the delay. Pins 0x15 and 0x18 both call: \_SB.PCI0.SBRG.HNC0()
>>>>>>>> Traced it further. HNC0(pin, 0) takes the Else branch and calls:
>>>>>>>> ATKM(0xC0)
>>>>>>>> ADTM(Zero)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ADTM calls NOD2(), which is the actual culprit:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While ((Arg0 != RDNT))
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> If ((Local0 >= 0x0F)) { Break }
>>>>>>>> Notify (^^GPP0.PEGP, Arg0)
>>>>>>>> Local0++
>>>>>>>> Sleep (Local0 * 0x64)
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It notifies the dGPU and polls RDNT, sleeping 100, 200, ... 1500ms per iteration.
>>>>>>>> Max 15 loops = ~12s per pin. GPU doesn't respond at boot so it maxes out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Two pins, ~12s each, ~24-36s total.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Francesco
>>>>>>> Any idea why isn't the dGPU responding? I would have expected
>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/4d4c10f763d78 sets up policy that it's
>>>>>>> in D0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the dGPU turned off in BIOS or through some reverse engineered
>>>>>>> tool/API or something?
>>>>>> dmesg without the workaround:
>>>>>> [    1.005184] pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
>>>>>> [    1.288811] pci 0000:01:00.0: vgaarb: VGA device added
>>>>>> [   38.250139] nvidia: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
>>>>>> [   38.369358] nvidia 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
>>>>>> [   39.744421] NVRM: GPS ACPI DSM called before _acpiDsmSupportedFuncCacheInit
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GPU is in D0 from 1.0s. nvidia loads at 38.2s after the GPIO hang completes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No weird tools/APIs besides userspace utils (asusctl/supergfxctl).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No changes to BIOS factory defaults other than disabling Fast Boot.
>>>>>> dGPU is active, Display Mode is Dynamic (hybrid).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Traced RDNT - it's set by GPS function 19 in the ACPI tables:
>>>>>> Case (0x13)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>       Debug = "GPS fun 19"
>>>>>>       \_SB.PCI0.SBRG.RDNT = (Local1 + 0xD1)
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I can understand GPIO initcall blocks at late_initcall_sync, preventing nvidia
>>>>>> from loading in time to respond. Based on the timing, GPU is awake but nothing can
>>>>>> register a handler while kernel is stuck at NOD2 polling loop.
>>>>> I wonder if you could try with the nouveau driver so that it's built-in to
>>>>> the kernel proper? Then it should be ready at the time these events
>>>>> trigger.
>>>> That is not really a workable solution though.
>>> Yeah, I did not meant it to be the "solution" rather just to check whether
>>> it is related if the GPU driver is there or not. You cannot build the
>>> proprietary driver into the kernel so that's why I suggested the
>>> open-source one.
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I would start saying sorry for the necrobump. I faced the same problem on my
>> G614PR and fixed the same way as Francesco.
>>
>> Do you happen to know if there is any news about this? I'm currently on
>> CachyOS with kernel 7.0 and noticed it behaves the same way as 6.19.
>>
>> I'm on to try patches or provide more infos if needed, even if I have to
>> admit I know Linux but not that deeply.
> As far as I can tell no updates unfortunately. I guess we could go with
> slightly updated patch from Francesco, like below that just ignores those
> two interrupts. Can you try if that works for you?
>
> This list of devices that suffer from the "edge events on boot" seems to be
> growing so maybe we should re-think if that should be enabled for all
> systems or limit to the problematic ones (although that list could get big
> too ;-))
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-quirks.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-quirks.c
> index a0116f004975..4e60a176ac93 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-quirks.c
> @@ -392,6 +392,23 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id gpiolib_acpi_quirks[] __initconst = {
>   			.ignore_wake = "VEN_0488:00@355",
>   		},
>   	},
> +	{
> +		/*
> +		 * The ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) ACPI GPIO configuration
> +		 * causes acpi_gpio_handle_deferred_request_irqs() to
> +		 * stall for ~36 seconds during boot so ignore the two
> +		 * interrupts involved.
> +		 *
> +		 * Found in BIOS G614PP.307.
> +		 */
> +		.matches = {
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "ROG Strix G16 G614PP_G614PP"),
> +		},
> +		.driver_data = &(struct acpi_gpiolib_dmi_quirk) {
> +			.ignore_interrupt = "AMDI0030:00@21,AMDI0030:00@24",
> +		},
> +	},
>   	{} /* Terminating entry */
>   };
>   

Hi Mika,

thank you for the quick reply. AFAICS the patch as is would only works 
for the G614PP and not for the others (for eg I have G614PR_G614PR).

Assuming all the variants suffer the same problem would it be ok to use 
a wildcard for it?


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-22  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2kSCn4XaoXsXJ3EUR0syTdmip8Z1cBuUr0Br4sFVnwnsA8q4GlhiHOmsJkeBxvxYoLnetp4r44wIPXw42yTAFl-BtMROnIwR-NkckKgA5EY=@protonmail.com>
2025-12-17 10:06 ` [BUG] 36-second boot delay due to by acpi_gpio_handle_deferred_request_irqs on ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Francesco Lauritano
2025-12-17 12:01   ` [PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: Disable edge events on boot on ASUS ROG Strix G16 G614PP francesco.lauritano1
2025-12-17 13:08     ` Mika Westerberg
2025-12-17 14:01       ` Francesco Lauritano
2025-12-28 20:15         ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-17 14:23   ` [BUG] 36-second boot delay due to by acpi_gpio_handle_deferred_request_irqs on ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Mario Limonciello
2025-12-17 15:12     ` Francesco Lauritano
2025-12-17 16:57       ` Francesco Lauritano
2025-12-17 18:01         ` Mario Limonciello
2025-12-17 19:19           ` Francesco Lauritano
2025-12-18  6:39             ` Mika Westerberg
2025-12-18 10:33               ` Hans de Goede
2025-12-18 10:38                 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-04-22  7:51                   ` Marco Scardovi
2026-04-22  9:07                     ` Mika Westerberg
2026-04-22  9:45                       ` Marco Scardovi [this message]
2026-04-22  9:55                         ` Mika Westerberg
2026-04-22 12:08                           ` Marco Scardovi
2026-04-23  4:42                             ` Mika Westerberg
2026-04-23  5:15                               ` Mario Limonciello
2026-04-23 17:46                                 ` Marco Scardovi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4e55e31e-a5e8-4098-8a7f-bb52476b882a@gmail.com \
    --to=mscardovi95@gmail.com \
    --cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=francesco.lauritano1@protonmail.com \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=superm1@kernel.org \
    --cc=westeri@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox